Cryopreservation of epididymal semen of domestic cat

Domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) is used as a model species for developing effective methods of wild felids’ semen cryopreservation. The present study represents a comparison of domestic cat semen cryopreservation with two commercially available cryoprotectant agents (CPAs): CaniPlus Freeze (CPF) and SpermFreeze (SF). Semen was collected from the caudal epididymises of adult males and frozen with CPF and SF, correspondingly. The viability of frozen-thawed spermatozoa was evaluated by VitalScreen kit, staining with hematoxylin and eosin was performed for analysis of the spermatozoa morphology; both analyses were combined with the light microscopy. The viability rate of the frozenthawed semen cryopreserved with CPF and SF did not differ: 32.3±4.4 % for CPF and 43.3±4.0 % for SF. Total percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa after freezing and thawing domestic cat semen was 26.0±2.3 % for CPF and 23.9±1.9 % for SF. In both cases, there were no differences from non-frozen semen, in the latter group the total percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology was 29.0±4.1 %. The most frequent anomalies were the anomalies of tail, and the rarest anomalies were head defects. The percentages of spermatozoa with anomalies of the head, mid piece, tail and combined did not differ in these three groups. Taken together these results suggest that both CPAs are suitable for the purpose of domestic cat semen freezing and cryopreservation, although CPF was designed for Canidae semen cryopreservation and SF was developed for human semen freezing and so far was used exclusively in reproductive medicine. It might be concluded that these two commercially available cryoprotectant media are applicable for the purposes of domestic cat breeds’ semen cryopreservation.

domestic cat, epididymal spermatozoa, cryopreservation

1. Agca Y. Genome resource banking of biomedically important laboratory animals. Theriogenology. 2012;78:1653-1665. DOI 10.1016/j. theriogenology.2012.08.012.

2. Amstislavsky S., Lindeberg H., Luvoni G.C. Reproductive technologies relevant to the genome resource bank in Carnivora. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012;47:164-175. DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01886.x.

3. Amstislavskiy S.Y., Brusentsev E.Y., Okotrub K.A., Rozhkova I.N. Embryo and gamete cryopreservation for the conservation of laboratory animal genetic resources. Ontogenez = Ontogenesis. 2015;46(2):67-81. DOI 10.7868/S0475145015020020. (in Russian)

4. Amstislavskiy S.Y., Kizilova E.A., Brusentsev E.Y., Abramova T.O., Naprimerov V.A. Cryopreservation of epididymal semen in Djungarian (Phodopus sungorus, Cricetinae) and Campbell’s (Phodopus campbelli) hamsters. Zoologicheskiy zhurnal = Zoological Journal. 2016;95(5):604-613. DOI 10.7868/S0044513416050044. (in Russian)

5. Amstislavskiy S.Y., Kozhevnikova V.V., Muzika V.V., Kizilova E.A. Reproductive biology and a genome resource bank of Felidae. Ontogenez = Ontogenesis. 2017;48(2):93-106. DOI 10.7868/ S0475145017020021. (in Russian)

6. Bandularatne E., Bongso A. Evaluation of human sperm function after repeated freezing and thawing. J. Androl. 2002;23:242-249. DOI 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02621.x.

7. Blom E. A one-minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosinnigrosin. Fertil. Steril. 1950;1:176-177.

8. Buranaamnuay K. Determination of appropriate cryopreservation protocols for epididymal cat spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2015; 50:378-385. DOI 10.1111/rda.12496.

9. Comizzoli P., Crosier A.E., Songsasen N., Szykman Gunther M., Howard J.G., Wildt D.E. Advances in reproductive science for wild carnivore conservation. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009;44:47-52. DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01373.x.

10. Contri A., Zambelli D., Faustini M., Cunto M., Gloria A., Carluccio A. Artificial neural networks for the definition of kinetic subpopulations in electroejaculated and epididymal spermatozoa in the do mestic cat. Reproduction. 2012;144:339-347. DOI 10.1530/REP-12-0125.

11. Driscoll C.A., Clutton-Brock J., Kitchener A.C., O’Brien S.J. The taming of the cat. Genetic and archaeological findings hint that wildcats became housecats earlier – and in a different place – than previously thought. Sci. Am. 2009;300:68-75. DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican 0609-68.

12. Fickel J., Wagener A., Ludwig A. Semen cryopreservation and the conservation of endangered species. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2007;53(2):81-89. DOI 10.1007/s10344-007-0089-z.

13. Gomes-Alves S., Alvarez M., Nicolas M., Lopez-Uruena E., Martinez-Rodriguez C., Borragan S., de Paz P., Anel L. Use of commercial extenders and alternatives to prevent sperm agglutination for cryopreservation of brown bear semen. Theriogenology. 2014;82:469-474. DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.05.015.

14. Hidalgo M., Portero J.M., Demyda-Peyras S., Ortiz I., Dorado J. Cryopreservation of canine semen after cold storage in a Neopor box: effect of extender, centrifugation and storage time. Vet. Rec. 2014; 175:20. DOI 10.1136/vr.102010.

15. Jewgenow K., Braun B.C., Dehnhard M., Zahmel J., Goeritz F. Research on reproduction is essential for captive breeding of endangered carnivore species. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2017;2:18-23. DOI 10.1111/rda.12836.

16. Johnson S.D., Root Kustritz M.V., Olson P.N.S. Canine and Feline Theriogenology. Philadelphia: Saunders Comp., 2001;592. Johnson W.E., Eizirik E., Pecon-Slattery J., Murphy W.J., Antunes A., Teeling E., O’Brien S.J. The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment. Science. 2006;311(5757):73-77. DOI 10.1126/science.1122277.

17. Kunkitti P., Axner E., Bergqvist A.S., Sjunnesson Y. In vitro fertilization using frozen-thawed feline epididymal spermatozoa from corpus and cauda regions. Theriogenology. 2016;86:1403-1408. DOI 10.1016/j. theriogenology.2016.04.085.

18. Luvoni G.C. Gamete cryopreservation in the domestic cat. Theriogeno-logy. 2006;66:101-111. DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.03.012.

19. O’Brien S.J., Johnson W., Driscoll C., Pontius J., Pecon-Slattery J., Menotti-Raymond M. State of cat genomics. Trends Genet. 2008; 24(6):268-279. DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2008.03.004.

20. Prochowska S., Nizanski W., Partyka A. Comparative analysis of in vitro characteristics of fresh and frozen-thawed urethral and epididymal spermatozoa from cats (Felis domesticus). Theriogenology. 2016;86:2063-2072. DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.07.002.

21. Rijsselaere T., Van Soom A. Semen collection, assessment and artificial insemination in the cat. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift. 2010; 79:467-470.

22. Tsutsui T. Artificial insemination in domestic cats (Felis catus). Theriogenology. 2006;66:122-125. DOI 10.1016/j. theriogenology.2006. 03.015.

23. Wildt D.E., Monfort S.L., Donoghue A.M., Johnston L.A., Howard

24. J.G. Embryogenesis in conservation biology – or, how to make an endangered species embryo. Theriogenology. 1992;37:161-184. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90253-N.

25. Zambelli D., Bergonzoni M.L., De Fanti C., Carluccio A. Sperm morphology evaluation techniques in the cat, rabbit and dog. Vet. Proceedings. 1993;47:279-283.

26. Zambelli D., Caneppele B., Castagnetti C., Belluzzi S. Cryopreservation of cat semen in straws: comparison of five different freezing rates. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2002;37:310-313. DOI 10.1046/j. 1439-0531.2002.00365.x.