Wheat leaf epidermal pattern as a model for studying the influence of stress conditions on morphogenesis

The leaf epidermis of a monocotyledonous plant is a widely used model system for studying the differentiation of plant cells, as it contains readily observable specialized cells. The approach proposed in this paper uses a growing cereal leaf to study stress-induced dynamic changes in morphogenesis. In the process of formation, the linear leaf of wheat remains in the stationary growth phase for long. This fact permits us to observe a series of successive morphogenetic events recorded in the cellular structure of the mature leaf. In studying the cellular architecture of the wheat leaf epidermis, we obtained and processed confocal 3D images of wheat leaves stained with fluorescent dyes. This procedure allows an accurate morphometric description and determination of quantitative characteristics of the leaf epidermal pattern. Low temperatures are among the factors limiting the growing of crop plants in the temperate zone. In the present work, we show significant aberrations of stomatal morphogenesis in the epidermis of boot leaves of wheat varieties Saratovskaya 29 and Yanetskis Probat in response to cold stress. We found that nonfunctional stomata predominated in the zone of maximum manifestation of stress, whereas in the zones formed before and after the stress impact, the developmental anomalies come to the disturbance in the morphogenesis of subsidiary cells. In Saratovskaya 29, a significant amount of ectopic trichomes formed in rows predetermined to stoma formation. The proposed approach can provide standardized qualitative and quantitative data on stress-induced morphogenesis aberrations in wheat leaf epidermis. Subsequently, these data can be used for verification of computer models of leaf morphogenesis. Further study of the mechanisms of the effect of cold stress on morphogenesis will add to the search for additional opportunities to increase wheat yields in areas of risky agriculture.

1. Venzhik J.V., Titov A.F., Talanova V.V., Miroslavov E.D., Koteeva N.K. Structural and functional reorganization of photosynthetic apparatus in cold adaptation of wheat plants. Tsitologiya = Cytology (St.-Petersburg). 2012;54(12):916-924. Available at http://www.tsitologiya.cytspb.rssi.ru/54_12/venzhik.pdf. (in Russian)

2. Doroshkov A.V., Pshenichnikova T.A., Afonnikov D.A. Morphological сharacterization and inheritance of leaf hairiness in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as analyzed by computer-aided phenotyping. Russ. J. Genet. 2011;47(6):739-743. DOI 10.1134/S1022795411060093.

3. Chater C.C., Caine R.S., Fleming A.J., Gray J.E. Origins and evolution of stomatal development. Plant Physiol. 2017;174(2):624-638. DOI 10.1104/pp.17.00183.

4. Collins T.J. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques. 2007;43(Suppl. 1): 25-30. DOI 10.2144/000112517.

5. Dale J.E., Stacciarini Seraphin E., Sattin M. The effects of root cooling on leaf growth. Eds. W.J. Davies, B. Jeffcoat. Importance of Root to Shoot Communication in the Responses to Environmental Stress. Bristol, UK: British Society for Plant Growth Regulation, 1990;21: 149-161. Available at: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19920754078.

6. Doroshkov A.V., Afonnikov D.A., Dobrovolskaya O.B., Pshenichnikova T.A. Interactions between leaf pubescence genes in bread wheat as assessed by high throughput phenotyping. Euphytica. 2016;207(3):491-500. DOI 10.1007/s10681-015-1520-2.

7. Gallagher K., Smith L.G. Roles for polarity and nuclear determinants in specifying daughter cell fates after an asymmetric cell division in the maize leaf. Curr. Biol. 2000;10(19):1229-1232. DOI 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00730-2.

8. Hepworth C., Caine R.S., Harrison E.L., Sloan J., Gray J.E. Stomatal development: focusing on the grasses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018; 41:1-7. DOI 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.07.009.

9. Limin A.E., Fowler D.B. Inheritance of cell size in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and its relationship to the vernalization loci. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001;103(2-3):277-281. DOI 10.1007/s00122-001-0550-4.

10. Liu T., Ohashi-Ito K., Bergmann D.C. Orthologs of Arabidopsis thali-ana stomatal bHLH genes and regulation of stomatal development in grasses. Development. 2009;136(13):2265-2276. DOI 10.1242/dev.032938.

11. Matias-Hernandez L., Aguilar-Jaramillo A.E., Cigliano R.A., Sansever-ino W., Pelaz S. Flowering and trichome development share hormonal and transcription factor regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2015;67(5):1209-1219. DOI 10.1093/jxb/erv534.

12. Peterson K.M., Rychel A.L., Torii K.U. Out of the mouths of plants: the molecular basis of the evolution and diversity of stomatal development. The Plant Cell. 2010;22(2):296-306. DOI 10.1105/tpc.109.072777.

13. Rudall P.J., Chen E.D., Cullen E. Evolution and development of monocot stomata. Am. J. Bot. 2017;104(8):1122-1141. DOI 10.3732/ajb.1700086.

14. Skinner R.H., Nelson C.J. Elongation of the grass leaf and its relationship to the phyllochron. Crop Sci. 1995;35(1):4-10. DOI 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010002x.

15. Xiong L., Schumaker K.S., Zhu J.K. Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell. 2002;14(Suppl. 1):S165-S183. DOI 10.1105/tpc.000596.

16. Yadav S.K. Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2010;30(3):515-527. DOI 10.1051/agro/2009050.

17. Yang C., Ye Z. Trichomes as models for studying plant cell differentiation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013;70(11):1937-1948. DOI 10.1007/s00018-012-1147-6.