Comparative analysis of the ftness of Drosophila virilis lines contrasting in response to stress

One of the crucial elements contributing to the adaptation of organisms to unfavorable environmental conditions is the reaction of stress. The study of its genetic control and role in adaptation to unfavorable conditions are of special interest. The juvenile hormone (JH) acts as a gonadotropic hormone in adult insects controlling the development of the ovaries, inducing vitellogenesis and oviposition. It was shown that a decrease in JH degradation in individuals reacting to adverse conditions by stress reaction (R­individuals) causes delay in egg laying and seems to allow the population to “wait out” the unfavorable conditions, thereby contributing to the adaptation at the population level. However, monitoring natural populations of D. melanogaster for the capability of stress reaction demonstrated that they have a high percentage of individuals incapable of it (NR­individuals). The study of reproductive characteristics of R­ and NR­individuals showed that under normal conditions R­individuals have the advantage of procreating offspring. Under unfavorable conditions, if the stressor is intense enough, NR­individuals die, but if its intensity is low, then they, unlike R­individuals, continue to produce offspring. Based on these data, it was hypothesized that the balance of R­ and NR­alleles in the population ensures its adaptation under frequent stresses of low intensity. To verify the hypothesis by an experiment, the ftness characteristics (lifespan, fecundity) of the R and NR lines of D. virilis were studied under normal conditions and under regular heat stress of various frequency.

1. Rauschenbach I.Yu. Stress-response in insects: mechanism, genetic control, and role in adaptation. Genetika = Genetics (Moscow). 1997;33:1110-1118. (in Russian)

2. Rauschenbach I.Yu., Schumnaja L.V. Biogenic amines in the stress reaction in insects. Uspekhi Sovremennoy Biologii = Advances in Current Biology. 1993;113:327-335. (in Russian)

3. Apfeld J., O’Connor G., McDonagh T., DiStefano P.S., Curtis R. The AMP-activated protein kinase AAK-2 links energy levels and insulinlike signals to lifespan in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2004;18(24):3004- 3009. DOI 10.1101/gad.1255404.

4. Chernysh S.I. Neuroendocrine system in insect stress. In: Ivanovic J., Jankovic-Hladni M. (Eds.). Hormones and Metabolism in Insect Stress. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991;69-98.

5. Djawаdan M., Chippindale A.K., Rose M.R., Bradley T.J. Metabolic reserves and evolved stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol. Zool. 1998;71(5):584-594.

6. Force A.G., Staples T., Soliman S., Arking R.A. Comparative and evolved stress analysis of genetically selected Drosophila strains with different longevities. Dev. Genet. 1995:17(4):340-351.

7. Goodman W.G., Granger N.A. The Juvenile Hormones. In: Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science. Vol. 3. Oxford: Elsevier, 2005; 319-408.

8. Gruntenko N.E., Bogomolova E.V., Adonyeva N.V., Karpova E.K., Menshanov P.N., Alekseev A.A., Romanova I.V., Li S., Rauschenbach I.Y. Decrease in juvenile hormone level as a result of genetic ablation of the corpus allatum cells affects the synthesis and metabolism of stress related hormones in Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 2012;58:49-55. DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.09.015.

9. Gruntenko N.E., Rauschenbach I.Yu. Interplay of JH, 20E and biogenic amines under normal and stress conditions and its effect on reproduction. J. Insect Physiol. 2008;54:902-908.

10. Hanna M.E., Bednárová A., Rakshit K., Chaudhuri A., O’Donnell J.M., Krishnan N. Perturbations in dopamine synthesis lead to discrete physiological effects and impact oxidative stress response in Drosophila. J. Insect Physiol. 2015;73:11-19. DOI 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.01.001.

11. Harshman L.G., Moore K.M., Sty M.A., Magwire M.M. Stress resistance and longevity in selected lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Neurobiol. Aging. 1999;20:521-529.

12. Hercus M.J., Loeschcke V., Rattan S.I.S. Lifespan extension of Drosophila melanogaster through hormesis by repeated mild heat stress. Biogerontology. 2003;4:149-156.

13. Hirashima A., Sukhanova M.Jh., Rauschenbach I.Yu. Biogenic amines in Drosophila virilis under stress conditions. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2000;64:2625-2630.

14. Hsu A.L., Murphy C.T., Kenyon C. Regulation of aging and age-related disease by DAF-16 and heat-shock factor. Science. 2003;300:1142- 1145.

15. Kenyon C. The plasticity of aging: insights from long-lived mutants. Cell. 2005;120(4):449-460.

16. Krebs R.A., Loeschcke V. A genetic analysis of the relationship between life-history variation and heat-shock tolerance in Drosophila buzzatii. Heredity (Edinb). 1999;83:46-53.

17. Lithgow G.J., White T.M., Melov S., Johnson T.E. Thermotolerance and extended life-span conferred by single-gene mutations and induced by thermal stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:7540- 7544.

18. Luckinbill L.S. Selection for longevity confers resistence to low-temperature stress in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Gerontol. 1998;53: 147-153.

19. Morley J.F., Morimoto R.I. Regulation of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans by heat shock factor and molecular chaperones. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15(2):657-664.

20. Moskalev A., Zhikrivetskaya S., Krasnov G., Shaposhnikov M., Proshkina E., Borisoglebsky D., Danilov A., Peregudova D., Sharapova I., Dobrovolskaya E., Solovev I., Zemskaya N., Shilova L., Snezhkina A., Kudryavtseva A. A comparison of the transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster in response to entomopathogenic fungus, ionizing, starvation and cold shock. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16(Suppl.13):S8. DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-16-S13-S8.

21. Partridge L., Gems D., Withers D.J. Sex and death: what is the connection? Cell. 2005;120:461-472.

22. Rauschenbach I.Yu., Gruntenko N.E., Khlebodarova T.M., Mazurov M.M., Grenback L.G., Sukhanova M.Jh., Shumnaja L.V., Zakharov I.K., Hammock B.D. The role of the degradation system of the juvenile hormone in the reproduction of Drosophila under stress. J. Insect Physiol. 1996;42:735-742.

23. Rose M.R. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1984;38:1004-1010.

24. Salmon A.B., Marx D.B., Harshman L.G. A cost of reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: stress susceptibility. Evolution. 2001;55(8): 1600-1608.

25. Sarup P., Sørensen P., Loeschcke V. The long-term effects of a life-prolonging heat treatment on the Drosophila melanogaster transcriptome suggest that heat shock proteins extend lifespan. Exp. Gerontol. 2014;50:34-39. DOI 10.1016/j.exger.2013.11.017.

26. Service P.M., Hutchinson E.W., Mackinley M.D., Rose M.R. Resistance to environmental stress in Drosophila melanogaster selected for postpone senescence. Physiol. Zool. 1985;58:380-389.

27. Śwęidrych A., Lorene-Kukuła K., Skirycz A., Szopa J. The catecholamine biosynthesis route in potato is affected by stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004;42:593-600.

28. Tower J. Aging mechanisms in fruit flies. Bioessay.1996;18(10):799-807.

29. Zwaan B., Bijsma R., Hoekstra R.A. Direct selection on life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1995;49:649-659.