Preview

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Advanced search

Biotechnological methods as a tool for efficient sugar beet breeding

https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ20.593

Abstract

Here we consider aspects of the application of biotechnological methods to rapid creation, propagation, and maintenance of plants with improved or new traits in sugar beet breeding. The results of the works carried out in these fields by the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "The A.L. Mazlumov All-Russia Research Institute of Sugar Beet” are reviewed. A close association between morphological and physiological changes in in vitro cultured organs and tissues, on the one hand, and breeding traits, on the other hand, which allows the development of experimental systems for non-amphimictic plant reconstruction is shown. The influence of in vitro growth conditions on haploid cells of unfertilized sugar beet ovules in the course of obtaining doubled haploid lines with high degree of homozygosity and maintenance of valuable breeding properties is considered. As compared to common inbreeding, this method shortens the time for development of homozygous material from 10-12 to 3-5 years, which is of great importance for speeding-up the breeding process. The results of studies on the culturing of mature sugar beet zygotic embryos based on in vitro selective systems have made it possible to improve the adaptive potential of plants and to provide complex resistance to environmental stress factors. Strict selection under abiotic stress conditions allowed creation of sugar beet isogenic lines with tolerance of drought, salinity, and soil acidity. It is shown that the proposed original design of mass-scale microclonal in vitro reproduction and deposition of elite plants as components of highly productive hybrids can be used to obtain seeds of uniform high-quality breeding material. The technologies developed by biotechnological methods are a topical and innovative direction of inquiry, since the application of these techniques to sugar beet breeding will promote obtaining of competitive hybrids with a set of commercially valuable traits. The combination of biotechnology methods, including tissue culture, and traditional breeding techniques is expected to provide an opportunity to obtain a new starting material to develop domestic varieties and hybrids of new generation with heterosis effect and a wide resistance spectrum persisting across generations.

About the Authors

T. P. Zhuzhzhalova
A.L. Mazlumov All-Russia Research Institute of Sugar Beet
Russian Federation
VNIISS, Ramon raion, Voronezh oblast


E. O. Kolesnikova
A.L. Mazlumov All-Russia Research Institute of Sugar Beet
Russian Federation
VNIISS, Ramon raion, Voronezh oblast


E. N. Vasilchenko
A.L. Mazlumov All-Russia Research Institute of Sugar Beet
Russian Federation
VNIISS, Ramon raion, Voronezh oblast


N. N. Cherkasova
A.L. Mazlumov All-Russia Research Institute of Sugar Beet
Russian Federation
VNIISS, Ramon raion, Voronezh oblast


References

1. Barykina R.P., Veselova T.D., Devyatov A.G., Dzhalilova Kh. Kh., Ilyina G.M., Chubatova N.V The Handbook of Botanic Microtechniques: Fundamentals and Methods. Moscow: Publ. House of Moscow State University, 2004. Available at http://bookre.org/reader?file=1483744&pg=1 (in Russian)

2. Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., Teare I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-207. DOI 10.1007/BF00018060.

3. Batygina T.B. Embryoidogeny is a new type of a vegetative propagation. In: Batygina T.B. (Ed.). Embryology of Flowering Plants: Terminology and Concepts. Vol. 3. Reproductive Systems. St. Petersburg: Mir i Semya Publ., 2000;334-349. Available at https://www.twirpx.com/file/435188/ (in Russian)

4. Batygina T.B., Kruglova N.N., Gorbunova VYu., Titova G.E., Seldimirova O.A. From a Microspore to a Variety. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2010. (in Russian)

5. Batygina T.B., Vasilyeva V.E. Plant Reproduction. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publ., 2002. (in Russian)

6. Beckmann J.S., Soller M. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and costs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1983;67:35-43. dOi 10.1007/BF00303919.

7. Butenko R.G. Isolated Tissue Culture and Physiology of Plant Morphogenesis. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1964. (in Russian)

8. Cherkasova N.N., Zhuzhzhalova T.P. Obtaining osmosisresistant sugar beet plants under in vitro culture. Sakharnaya Svekla = Sugar Beet. 2011;7:22-24. (in Russian)

9. Cherkasova N.N., Zhuzhzhalova T.P. Modeling of in vitro breeding conditions to develop sugar beet forms resistant to environment stress factors. Sakharnaya Svekla = Sugar Beet. 2014;6:16-18. (in Russian)

10. Cherkasova N.N., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Kolesnikova E.O. Development of sugar beet regenerant plants resistant to a set of stress factors. Sakhar = Sugar. 2018;5:28-30. (in Russian)

11. Dukhovsky P., Yuknis R., Brazaitite A., Zukauskaite I. Plant response to integrated impact of natural and anthropogenic stress factors. Fiziologiya Rasteniy = Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2003;50(2):147-154.

12. Gurel S., Gurel E., Kaya Z., Erdal M., Guler E. Effects of antimitotic agents on haploid plant production from unpollinated ovules of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2003;17(2):97-101. DOI 10.1080/13102818.2003.10817065.

13. Kikindonov G., Kikindonov Tz., Enchev S. Economical qualities of crosses between doubled haploid sugar beet lines. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016;8(2):107-110. DOI 10.15547/ast.2016.02.018.

14. Kilchevsky A.V, Khotyleva L.V (Eds.). Genetical Basis of Plant Breeding. Vol. 3. Biotechnology in Plant Breeding. Cell Engineering. Minsk: Belarus. Navuka Publ., 2012;203-216. (in Russian)

15. Kolesnikova E.O., Vasilchenko E.N., Cherkasova N.N. Possibilities of using biotechnology methods for sugar beet in breeding process. In: Scientific Support of BeetGrowing Industry: Proc. of the Int. scientific-practical conf. dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the Sugar Beet Experimental Research Station (Nesvizh, September 5-6, 2018). Minsk: Belarus. Navuka Publ., 2018a;40-48. (in Russian)

16. Kolesnikova E.O., Zhuzhzhalova T.P. Microcloning and maintenance of lines material in sugar beet breeding process. In: Proc. of IV (XII) Int. Botanical Conf. of Young Scientists in St. Petersburg, April 22-28, 2018. St. Petersburg, 2018;267-268.

17. Kolesnikova E.O., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Cherkasova N.N., Vasilchenko E.N. Рerspective technologies of isolated tissue culture in sugar beet breeding process. Ros-siyskaya Selskokhozyaystvennaya Nauka = Russian Agricultural Sciences. 2018b;6:13-17. DOI 10.31857/S250026270001825-2 (in Russian)

18. Kosareva I.A. The study of crops and wild relatives collections for signs of resistance to toxic elements of acid soils. Trudy po Prikladnoy Botanike, Genetike i Selektsii = Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics, and Breeding. 2012;170:35-45. (in Russian)

19. Kozlovsky VF., Apasov I.V., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Fedulo-va T.P. Main directions and results of sugar beet breeding in USA. Sakharnaya Svekla = Sugar Beet. 2016;8:35-41. (in Russian)

20. Lamaoui M., Jemo M., Datla R., Bekkaoui E. Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Front. Chem. 2018;6:26. DOI 10.3389/fchem.2018.00026.

21. Nitzsche W., Wenzel G. Haploids in Plant Breeding. Berlin; Hamburg, 1977. (Russ. ed. Nitsshe V, Ventsel’ G. Gaploidy v selektsii rasteniy. Moscow: Kolos Publ., 1980.)

22. Pausheva Z.P. Workshop on Plant Cytology. Moscow: Agropromizdat Publ., 1988. (in Russian)

23. Rahnama A., Munns R., Poustini K., Watt M. A screening method to identify genetic variation in root growth response to a salinity gradient. J. Exp. Bot. 2011;62;69-77. DOI 10.1093/jxb/erq359.

24. Shabala S., Munns R. Salinity stress: physiological constraints and adaptive mechanisms. In: Shabala S. (Ed.). Plant Stress Physiology. 2nd edn. CABI, 2017;24-64.

25. Soshnikova T.N., Radyukina N.L., Korolkova D.V., Nosov A.V Proline and functioning of an antioxidant plant system and cultivated cells of Thellungiella salsuginea during oxidative stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2013;60(1): 41-54. DOI 10.1134/S1021443713010093.

26. Tomaszewska-Sowa M. Cytometric analyses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants regenerated from unfertilized ovules cultured in vitro. Plant Breed. 2010;2: 231-235.

27. Tomaszewska-Sowa M. Effect of growth regulators and other components of culture medium on morphogenesis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in unfertilised ovule in vitro cultures. Acta Agrobotanica. 2012;65(4):91-100. DOI 10.5586/aa.2012.025.

28. Vanyushin B.F. DNA methylation is an epigenetic regulation of growth and development of plants. In: Development Biology: Morphogenesis of Reproductive Structures and a Role of Somatic, Stem Cells in Ontogenesis and Evolution: Proceedings of the Int. conf. dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the Laboratory of Embryology and Reproductive Biology, Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (December 13-16, 2010). Moscow: KMK Association of Scientific Editions. 2010;41-43. (in Russian)

29. Vasilchenko E.N. Induction of haploid partenogeny of sugar beet in vitro. Sakharnaya Svekla = Sugar Beet. 2016;6:2-4. (in Russian)

30. Vasilchenko E.N., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Vashchenko T.G., Kolesnikova E.O. The technology of creating restitution sugar beet lines. Vestnik VGAU = Bulletin of Voronezh State Agrarian University. 2018;1(56):42-50. DOI 10.172338/issn2071-2243.2018.1.56. (in Russian)

31. Zemlyanukhina O.A., Cherkasova N.N., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Kalaev V.N. Biochemical and morphological traits of sugar beet acid-resistant plants-regenerants (Beta vulgaris L.). Vestnik VGU = Bulletin of Voronezh State University. 2017;2:59-67. (in Russian)

32. Zemlyanukhina O.A., Vasilchenko E.N., Karpechenko N.A., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Karpechenko I.Yu., Kalaev VN. Molecular-biochemical characters of haploid and dihaploid sugar beet regenerant plants. In: Proc. of the V Congress of CIS physiologists, V Congress of Russia biochemists, Adflim Conferences. ActaNaturae (spec. iss.). 2016;2:59. (in Russian)

33. Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Kolesnikova E.O., Vasilchenko E.N., Cherkasova N.N. Issues of microcloning use in sugar beet breeding. Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference “Breeding and Genetic Science and Education: Pariyskiy readings. March 19-21, 2018. Uman, Ukraine, 2018:78-81. (in Russian)

34. Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Podvigina O.A., Znamenskaya VV, Vasilchenko E.N., Karpechenko N.A., Zemlyanukhi-na O.A. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) haploid parthenogenesis in vitro: factors and diagnostic characters. Sels-kokhozyaystvennaya Biologiya = Agricultural Biology. 2016;51(5):636-644. DOI 10.15389/agrobiology.2016.5.636eng.

35. Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Znamenskaya VV, Oshevnev V.P., Gribanova N.P., Kolesnikova E.O., Vasilchenko E.N., Cherkasova N.N. An innovative method of sugar beet in vitro micropropagation in the breeding process. Sakhamaya Svekla = Sugar Beet. 2017;4:12-18. (in Russian)

36. Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Znamenskaya V.V., Podvigina O.A., Yarmolyuk G.I. Reproductive Biology of Sugar Beet. Voronezh: Sotrudnichestvo Publ., 2006. (in Russian)

37. Znamenskaya VV. In vitro microcloning as a method of maintenance and reproduction of sugar beet lines. In: Encyclopedia of Beta Genus. Biology, Genetics, and Breeding of Beet. Novosibirsk: Sova Publ., 2010;420-437. (in Russian)


Review

Views: 1428


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)