Wild pea (Pisum sativumPisum sativum L. subsp. elatius (Bieb.) Aschers. et Graebn. s.l.) at the periphery of its range: Zagros Mountains

Characteristics of wild peas and their habitats at the periphery of the range are interesting with respect to their potential importance for pre-breeding programs aimed at selection for different environmental conditions. However, wild pea diversity in peripheral regions is insufficiently represented in the existing germplasm collections. In such regions, wild pea populations are rare, small in size and suffer from climatic change and land exploitation, hence their focused search is strongly desirable. A two-week-long expedition to Iran in May 2017 revealed two small populations of the wild pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius) in the Zagros Mts, in Aligudarz and Khorramabad Districts of Lorestan Province, Iran, at elevations of 1841 and 1971 m a.s.l., respectively. Their habitats are briefly described. Two pea accessions derived from them, CE9 and CE10, were characterised for some visible and molecular characters. These peas appeared to belong to the evolutionary lineage B, recognised by us earlier in P sativum as opposed to the so-called lineage AC. They contain a unique non-conservative substitution in subtype 5 of histone H1 and turned to be most related to some wild pea accessions originating from southern and south-eastern Turkey and Golan Heights. Scarce information available on wild pea occurrence in Iran suggests their existence in the south-western principal slope of Zagros Mts and southern principal slopes of Elborz and Kopet Dagh Mts. It was found that wild peas representing the evolutionary lineage B produce poorly open and poorly coloured flowers (as reported by us earlier) only in the greenhouse conditions but normally pigmented and open flowers in the wild and mesh houses at open air in Israel. Some issues of pea taxonomy are discussed.

1. Abbo S., Lev-Yadun S., Heun M. Gopher A. On the ‘lost crops’ of the neolithic Near East. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:815-822. DOI 10.1093/jxb/ers373.

2. Abbo S., Zesak I., Schwartz E., Lev-Yadun S., Gopher A. Experimental harvesting of wild peas in Israel: implications for the origins of Near East farming. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2008;35:922-929. DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.016.

3. Ben-Ze’ev N., Zohary D. Species relationship in the genus Pisum L. Israel J. Botany. 1973;2:73-91.

4. Berdnikov V.A., Trusov Y.A., Bogdanova V.S., Kosterin O.E., Ro-zov S.M., Nedel’kina S.V., Nikulina Y.N. The neoplastic pod gene (Np) may be a factor for resistance in pea to the pest Bruchus pisorum L. Pisum Genetics. 1992;24:37-39.

5. Blixt S. Mutation genetics in Pisum. Agri Hortique Genetica. 1972;30: 1-294.

6. Bogdanova V.S., Mglinets A.V., Shatskaya N.V., Kosterin O.E., Solovyev V.I., Vasiliev G.V. Cryptic divergences in the genus Pisum L. (peas), as revealed by phylogenetic analysis of plastid genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018;129:280-290.

7. Coulot P., Rabaute P. Monographie de Leguminosae de France. 4. Tribus des Fabeae, des Cicereae et des Genisteae. Bulletin de la Societe Botanique du Centre-Ouest. 2016;46:1-902.

8. Coulot P., Rabaute P. Deuxiemes complements a la Monographie des Leguminosae de France. Le Monde des Plantes. 2017;516:11-35.

9. Coyne C.J., McGee R.J., Redden R.J., Ambrose M.J., Furman B.J., Miles C.A. Genetic adjustment to changing climate: pea. In: Yadav S.S., Redden J.H., Lotze-Campen H., Hall A.J. (Eds.). Crop Adaptation to Climate Change. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2011;238-250.

10. Grichanov I.Y., Ahmadi A., Kosterin O.E. New records of long-legged flies (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) from Central and North-Eastern Iran. Acta Biologica Sibirica. 2017;3(4):99-112.

11. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Oberreifenberg: Koeltz Scientific Books, 2012.

12. Kosterin O.E. Under the reign of the Pea King (the difficult fate of the first genetical object. Russ. J. Genet.: Appl. Res. 2016a:6(1):1-14. DOI 10.1134/S2079059716010081.

13. Kosterin O.E. Prospects of the use of wild relatives for pea breeding. Russ. J. Genet.: Appl. Res. 2016b;6(3):233-243. DOI 10.1134/S2079059716030047.

14. Kosterin O.E. Abyssinian pea (Lathyrus schaeferi Kosterin nom. nov. pro Pisum abyssinicum A. Br.) is a problematic taxon. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2017;21(2):158-169. DOI 10.18699/VJ17.234. (in Russian).

15. Kosterin O.E., Ahmadi A. Odonata observed in Central Zagros, Iran, in late May 2017. International Dragonfly Fund Report. 2018;117: 1-65.

16. Kosterin O.E., Bogdanova V.S. Relationship of wild and cultivated forms of Pisum L. as inferred from an analysis of three markers, of the plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 2008;55:735-755. DOI 10.1007/s10722-007-9281-y.

17. Kosterin O.E., Zaytseva O.O., Bogdanova V.S., Ambrose M. New data on three molecular markers from different cellular genomes in Mediterranean accessions reveal new insights into phylogeography of Pisum sativum L. subsp. elatuis (Beib.) Schmahl. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 2010;57:733-739. DOI 10.1007/s10722-009-9511-6.

18. Makasheva R.Kh. Cultivated Flora of the USSR. Vol. IV. Pulse and Legume Cultures. Part I. Pea. Leningrad: Kolos Publ., 1979. (in Russian).

19. Maxted N., Ambrose M. Peas (Pisum L.). In: Maxted N., Bennett S.J. (Eds.). Plant Genetic Resources of Legumes in the Mediterranean (Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture. 39). Klu-wer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2001;181-190.

20. Maxted N., Kell S.P. Establishment of a global network for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and needs. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Rome, 2009. DOI 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011719.03230.17.

21. Pakravan M., Jalilian N., Neamati M. Flora of Iran, No. 33. Papiliona-ceae (Vicieae). Ministry of Agriculture, Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, 2000. (in Farsi)

22. Reichinger K.H. Pisum. In: Chrtkova-Zertova A., van der Mae-sen L.J.G., Reichinger K.H. Papilionaceae I - Vicieae. Flora des Iranischen Hohlandes und der umrachmenden Gebirge. Persien, Afghanistan, Teile von West-Pakistan, Nord-Iraq, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan. No. 140. Academische Druck und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, 1979;83-86.

23. Schaefer H., Hechenleitner P., Santos-Guerra A., Menezes de Sequei-ra M., Pennington R.T., Kenicer G., Carine M.A. Systematics, biogeography, and character evolution of the legume tribe Fabeae with special focus on the middle-Atlantic island lineages. BMC Evol. Biol. 2012;12:250. DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-250.

24. Soldano A. Riproposizione di taxa sottospecifici prioritari dovuti a bo-tanici italiani. Natura Bresciana (Ann. Mus. Civ. Sci. Nat., Brescia). 1992;27:51-56.

25. Weiss E., Zohary D. The Neolithic Southwest Asian founder crops, their biology and archaeobotany. Curr. Anthropol. 2011;52(Suppl.4): S237-S254. DOI 10.1086/658367.

26. Zaytseva O.O., Bogdanova V.S., Kosterin O.E. Phylogenetic reconstruction at the species and intraspecies levels in the genus Pisum (L.) (peas) using a histone H1 gene. Gene. 2012;504:192-202. DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.026.

27. Zaytseva O.O., Bogdanova V.S., Mglinets A.V., Kosterin O.E. Refinement of the collection of wild peas (Pisum L.) and search for the area of pea domestication with a deletion in the plastidic psbA-trnH spacer. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017;64:1417-1430. DOI 10.1007/s10722-016-0446-4.

28. Zaytseva O.O., Gunbin K.V., Mglinets A.V., Kosterin O.E. Divergence and population traits in evolution of the genus Pisum L. as reconstructed using genes of two histone H1 subtypes showing different phylogenetic resolution. Gene. 2015;556:235-244.

29. Zlatcovic B., Mikić A., Smykal P. Distribution and new records of Pisum sativum subsp. elatius in Serbia. Pisum Genetics. 2010;42: 15-17.

30. Zohary D. Geobotanical foundations of the Middle East. I-II. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stutgart, 1973.

31. Zohary D., Hopf M. Domestication of Plants in the Old World. 3rd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.