Determination of the quantitative content of chlorophylls in leaves by reflection spectra using the random forest algorithm

Determining the quantitative content of chlorophylls in plant leaves by their reflection spectra is an important task both in monitoring the state of natural and industrial phytocenoses, and in laboratory studies of normal and pathological processes during plant growth. The use of machine learning methods for these purposes is promising, since these methods allow inferring the relationships between input and output variables (prediction model), and in order to improve the quality of the prediction, a researcher may modify predictors and selects a set of method parameters. Here, we present the results of the implementation and evaluation of the random forest algorithm for predicting the total concentration of chlorophylls a and b from the ref lection spectra of plant leaves in the visible and infrared wavelengths. We used the ref lection spectra for 276 leaf samples from 39 plant species obtained from open sources. 181 samples were from the sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.). The ref lection spectrum represented wavelengths from 400 to 2500 nm with a step of 1 nm. The training set consisted of the 85 % of A. pseudoplatanus L. samples, and the performance was evaluated on the remaining 15 % samples of this species (validation sample). Six models based on the random forest algorithm with different predictors were evaluated. The selection of control parameters was performed by cross-checking on five partitions. For the f irst model, the intensity of the ref lection spectra without any transformation was used. Based on the analysis of this model, the optimal ranges of wavelengths for the remaining f ive models were selected. The best results were obtained by models that used a two-point estimation of the derivative of the ref lection spectrum in the visible wavelength range as input data. We compared one of these models (the two-point estimation of the derivative of the ref lection spectrum in the range of 400–800 nm with a step of 1 nm) with the model by other authors (which is based on the functional dependence between two unknown parameters selected by the least squares method and two ref lection coeff icients, the choice of which is described in the article). The comparison of the results of predictions of the model based on the random forest algorithm with the model of other authors was carried out both on the validation sample of maple and on the sample from other plant species. In the f irst case, the predictions of the method based on a random forest had a lower estimate of the standard deviation. In the second case, the predictions of this method had a large error for small values of chlorophyll, while the third-party method had acceptable predictions. The article provides the analysis of the results, as well as recommendations for using this machine learning method to assess the quantitative content of chlorophylls in leaves.

random forest, remote methods, leaf optics, pigments

1. Alt V.V., Gurova T.A., Elkin O.V., Klimenko D.N., Maximov L.V., Pestunov I.A., Dubrovskaya O.A., Genaev M.A., Erst T.V., Genaev K.A., Komyshev E.G., Khlestkin V.K., Afonnikov D.A. The use of Specim IQ, a hyperspectral camera, for plant analysis. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2020;24(3):259-266. DOI 10.18699/VJ19.587. (in Russian)

2. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 1996;24:123-140. DOI 10.1023/A:1018054314350.

3. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32. DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324.

4. Croft H., Chen J. Leaf pigment content. In: Liang S. (Ed.). Comprehensive Remote Sensing. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2018;117-142. DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10547-0.

5. Curran P.J., Dungan J.L., Gholz H.L. Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine. Tree Physiol. 1990;7:33-48. DOI 10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.33.

6. Doktor D., Lausch A., Spengler D., Thurner M. Extraction of plant physiological status from hyperspectral signatures using machine learning methods. Remote Sens. 2014;6(12):12247-12274. DOI 10.3390/rs61212247.

7. Du H., Fuh R.-C. A., Li J., Corkan L.A., Lindsey J.S. PhotochemCAD: A computer-aided design and research tool in photochemistry. Photochem. Photobiol. 1998;68:141-142. DOI 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb02480.x.

8. Feng X., Zhan Y., Wang Q., Yang X., Yu C., Wang H., He Y. Hyperspectral imaging combined with machine learning as a tool to obtain high-throughput plant salt-stress phenotyping. Plant J. 2020; 101(6):1448-1461. DOI 10.1111/tpj.14597.

9. Féret J.-B., François C., Asner G.P., Gitelson A.A., Martin R.E., Bidel L.P.R., Ustin S.L., le Maire G., Jacquemoud S. PROSPECT-4 and 5: advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008;112:3030-3043. DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.012.

10. Gitelson A.A., Gritz Y., Merzlyak M.N. Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for nondestructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2003;160(3):271-282. DOI 10.1078/0176-1617-00887.

11. Gitelson A.A., Merzlyak M.N., Chivkunova O.B. Optical properties and nondestructive estimation of anthocyanin content in plant leaves. Photochem. Photobiol. 2001;74(1):38-45. DOI 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074<0038:OPANEO>2.0.CO;2.

12. Golhani K., Balasundram S.K., Vadamalai G., Pradhan B. A review of neural networks in plant disease detection using hyperspectral data. Inf. Process. Agric. 2018;5:354-371. DOI 10.1016/j.inpa.2018.05.002.

13. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. New York: SpringerVerlag, 2009. DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7.

14. Ho T.K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998;20(8):832-844. DOI 10.1109/34.709601.

15. Horler D.N.H., Dockray M., Barber J. The red edge of plant leaf reflectance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1983;4:273-288. DOI 10.1080/01431168308948546.

16. Jacquemound S., Bidel L., Francois C., Pavan G. ANGERS Leaf Optical Properties Database. 2003. Data set. Available online [ecosis.org] from the Ecological Spectral Information System (EcoSIS), 2003.

17. Keskitalo J., Bergquist G., Gardeström P., Jansson S. A cellular timetable of autumn senescence. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:1635-1648. DOI 10.1104/pp.105.066845.

18. Lichtenthaler H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148:350-382. DOI 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1.

19. Louppe G., Wehenkel L., Sutera A., Geurts P. Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2013;26:431-439.

20. Merzlyak M.N., Gitelson A.A., Chivkunova O.B., Solovchenko A.E., Pogosyan S.I. Application of reflectance spectroscopy for analysis of higher plant pigments. Rus. J. Plant Physiol. 2003;50(5):704-710. DOI 10.1023/A:1025608728405.

21. Młodzińska E. Survey of plant pigments: molecular and environmental determinants of plant colors. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2009;51(1): 7-16.

22. Nikolaev S.V., Urbanovich E.A., Shayapov V.R., Orlova E.A., Afonnikov D.A. A method of evaluating the absorption spectrum of wheat leaf by the spectrum of diffuse reflection. Sibirskii Vestnik Sel’skokhozyaistvennoi Nauki = Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science. 2018;48(5):68-76. DOI 10.26898/0370-8799-2018-5-9. (in Russian)

23. Porra R.J., Thompson W.A., Kriedemann P.E. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: Verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. BBA – Bioenergetics. 1989;975:384-394. DOI 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0.

24. Suo X.-M., Jang Y.-T., Yang M., Li S.-K., Wang K.-R., Wang C.-T. Artificial neural network to predict leaf population chlorophyll content from cotton plant images. Agric. Sci. China. 2010;9(1):38-45.

25. Wellburn A.R. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 1994;144:307-313. DOI 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2.