Evaluation of developmental competence of Sus scrofa domesticus (L.) oocyte-cumulus complexes after intra- and extraovarian vitrification

The aim of the present study was to identify the influence of extra- (EOV) and intraovarian vitrification (IOV) on mitochondrial activity (MA) and chromatin state in porcine oocytes during maturation in vitro. During EOV porcine oocytes were exposed in cryoprotective solutions (CPS): CPS-1 – 0.7 M dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)+0.9 M ethylene glycol (EG); CPS-2 – 1.4 M DMSO+1.8 M EG; CPS-3 – 2.8 M DMSO+3.6 M EG+0.65 M trehalose. At IOV the ovarian fragments were exposed in CPS-1 – 7.5 % EG+7.5 % DMSO, then in CPS-2 – 15 % EG, 15 % DMSO and 0.5 M sucrose. Straws with oocytes and ovarian fragments were plunged into LN2 and stored. For devitrification, the EOV oocytes were washed in solutions of 0.25, 0.19 and 0.125 M of trehalose, the IOV – in 0.5 and 0.25 М trehalose. Oocytes were cultured in NCSU-23 medium with 10 % fluid of follicles, follicular walls, hormones. 0.001 % of highly dispersed silica nanoparticles (ICP named after A.A. Chuyko of the NAS of Ukraine) were added to all media. The methods of fertilization and embryo culture are presented in the guidelines developed by us. MA and chromatin state were measured by MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos and the cytogenetic method. Significant differences in the level of oocytes with high-expanded cumulus between control and experimental vitrified groups (81 % versus 59 % and 52 %, respectively, p ≤ 0.001) were observed. The percentage of pyknotic cells in native oocytes was 19 %, EOV or IOV oocytes were 39 % and 49 %, respectively. After culture, the level of matured native oocytes was 86 %, 48 % EOV and 33 % IOV cells finished the maturation (p ≤ 0.001). Differences were also observed in the level of MA between groups treated by EOV and IOV (89.4±7.5 µA and 149.2±11.3 µA, respectively, p ≤ 0.05). For the first time, pre-implantation embryos were obtained from oocytes treated by IOV.

1. Abeydeera L.R., Wang W.H., Cantley T.C., Prather R.S., Day B.N. Presence of beta-mercaptoethanol can increase the glutathione content of pig oocytes matured in vitro and the rate of blastocyst development after in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology. 1998;50:747-756. DOI 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00180-0.

2. Al-Zubaidi U., Liu J., Cinar O., Robker R.L., Adhikari D., Carroll J. The spatio-temporal dynamics of mitochondrial membrane potential during oocyte maturation. Mol. Hum. Rep. 2019;25(11):695-705. DOI 10.1093/molehr/gaz055.

3. Amstislavsky S.Y., Brusentsev E.Y., Rozhkova I.N., Okotrub K.A. Embryo and gamete cryopreservation for genetic resources conservation of laboratory animals. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2015;46(2):47-59. DOI 10.1134/S1062360415020022.

4. Appeltant R., Somfai T., Santos E.C.S., Dang-Nguyen T.Q., Nagai T., Kikuchi K. Effects of vitrification of cumulus-enclosed porcine oocytes at the germinal vesicle stage on cumulus expansion, nuclear progression and cytoplasmic maturation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2017; 29(12):2419-2429. DOI 10.1071/RD16386.

5. Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. Theriogenology. 2012;77(3):467-482. DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.07.043.

6. Buderatska N.O., Petrushko M.P. Oocytes as alternative to embryos in cryopreservation applied in assisted reproductive technologies. Probl. Cryobiol. Cryomed. 2016;26(4):375-382. DOI 10.15407/cryo26.04.375.

7. Coello A., Pellicer A., Cobo A. Vitrification of human oocytes. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70(4):415-423. DOI 10.23736/S0026-4784.18. 04218-1.

8. Galagan N.P., Klymenko N.Y., Orel I.L., Novikova E.A., Turov V.V. Biofunctional nanomaterials based on ultrafine silica, protein and aminocarbohydrates. Biopolym. Cell. 2010;26(3):205-213. DOI 10.7124/bc.000158.

9. Joaquim D.C., Borges E.D., Viana I.G.R., Navarro P.A., Vireque A.A. Risk of contamination of gametes and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to prevent cross-contamination. BioMed Res. Int. 2017;4:1-11. DOI 10.1155/2017/1840417.

10. Kline D., Kline J.T. Repetitive calcium transients and the role of calcium in exocytosis and cell cycle activation in the mouse egg. Dev. Biol. 1992;149:80-89. DOI 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90265-i.

11. Kokotsaki M., Mairhofer M., Schneeberger C., Marschalek J., Pietrowski D. Impact of vitrification on granulosa cell survival and gene expression. Cryobiology. 2018;85:73-78. DOI 10.1016/j.cryobiol. 2018.09.006.

12. Kuzmina T.I., Alm H., Тorner H. Methods of Porcine Embryo Production in vitro. St. Petersburg, 2008. (in Russian)

13. Kuzmina T.I., Chistyakova I.V. Assessment of competence for the development of Bos taurus oocytes after intra- or extraovarial vitrification. Dostizheniya Nauki i Tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2020;34(2):61-64. DOI 10.24411/ 0235- 2451-2020-10213. (in Russian)

14. Kuzmina T.I., Epishko O.A., Usenbekov E.S. Effect of vitrification on mitoсhondrial activity of oocytes during in vitro maturation. Veterinariya = Veterinary. 2019;4:38-41. DOI 10.30896/0042-4846.2019. 22.4.38-41. (in Russian)

15. Lai D., Ding J., Smith G.W., Smith G.D., Takayama S. Slow and steady cell shrinkage reduces osmotic stress in bovine and murine oocyte and zygote vitrification. Hum. Rep. 2014;30(1):37-45. DOI 10.1093/humrep/deu284.

16. Larman M.G., Sheehan C.B., Gardner D.K. Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rates in mouse oocytes. Reproduction. 2006; 131:53-61. DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00878.

17. Mehlmann L.M. Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes: recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation. Reproduction. 2005;130(6):791-799. DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00793.

18. Moussa M., Shu J., Zhang X., Zeng F. Cryopreservation of mammalian oocytes and embryos: current problems and future perspective. Sci. China Life Sci. 2014;57(9):903-914. DOI 10.1007/s11427-014-4689-z.

19. Mullen S.F., Fahy G.M. A chronologic review of mature oocyte vitrification research in cattle, pigs, and sheep. Theriogenology. 2012;78: 1709-1719. DOI 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.06.008.

20. Novoderezhkina E.A., Zhivotovsky B.D., Gogvadze V.G. Induction of unspecific permeabilization of mitochondrial membrane and its role in cell death. Mol. Biol. 2016;50(1):43-58. DOI 10.1134/S0026893316010167.

21. Obata R., Nakumura Y., Okuyama N., Sasaki C. Comparison of residual dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethylene glycol (EG) concentration in bovine ovarian tissue during warming steps between slow freezing and vitrification. Cryo Lett. 2018;39(4):251-254. PMID: 30963170.

22. Pereira B.C., Ortiz I., Dorado J.M., Diaz-Jimenez M.A., Consuegra C., Gosalvez J., Hidalgo M. Effect of permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification on DNA fragmentation of equine oocyte-cumulus cells. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019;54(3):53-56. DOI 10.1111/rda.13491.

23. Shahsavari M.H., Moghaddam G., Daghigh Kia H. Effects of new synthetic cryoprotectant agents on histological characteristics of various classes of vitrified bovine pre-antral follicles. Vet. Res. Forum. 2019;10(1):9-16. DOI 10.30466/vrf.2019.34306.

24. Spricigo J., Rumpf R., Dode M.A.N. Vitrification of bovine oocytes: effect of the meiotic stage on nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. Biol. Reprod. 2011;85(1):721. DOI 10.1093/biolreprod/85.s1.721.

25. Tarkowski A.K. An air-drying method for chromosomal preparation from mouse eggs. Cytogenetic. 1966;1:394-400.

26. Wei J.H., Yuan X.Y., Zhang J.M., Wei J.Q. Caspase activity and oxidative stress of granulosa cells are associated with the viability and developmental potential of vitrified immature oocytes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016;198:22-26. DOI 10.1016/ j.ejogrb.2015.12.010.

27. Yang C.R., Miao D.Q., Zhang Q.H., Guo L., Tong J.S., Wei Y., Huang X., Hou Y., Schatten H., Liu Z., Sun Q.Y. Short-term preservation of porcine oocytes in ambient temperature: novel approaches. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14242. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014242.

28. Yang C.R., Wei Y., Qi S.T., Chen L., Zhang Q.H., Ma J.Y., Luo Y.B., Wang Y.P., Hou Y., Schatten H., Liu Z.H., Sun Q.Y. The G protein coupled receptor 3 is involved in cAMP and cGMP signaling and maintenance of meiotic arrest in porcine oocytes. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38807. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038807.

29. Yurchuk T., Petrushko M., Fuller B. Science of cryopreservation in reproductive medicine – Embryos and oocytes as exemplars. Early Hum. Dev. 2018;126:6-9. DOI 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.08.016.

30. Zavodnik I.B. Mitochondria, calcium homeostasis and calcium signaling. Biomeditsinskaya Khimiya = Biomedical Chemistry. 2016; 62(3):311-317. DOI 10.18097/PBMC20166203311. (in Russian)