CD-1 mice females recognize male reproductive success via volatile organic compounds in urine

Sexual selection is considered as one of the leading factors of evolutionary development. In the conditions of incessant competition, specialized methods of attracting individuals of the opposite sex as well as criteria for assessing the quality of a sexual partner have been formed. In order for animals to rely on signaling from sexual partners, the signal must reflect the morpho-physiological status of animals. A high reproductive efficiency of male mice is a good advantage for mate selection and thus must be somehow demonstrated to potential mates. The aim of our study was to find out if male mice could demonstrate their reproductive efficiency through urine volatile organic compounds. The experiment implies cohabiting one male with two mature females for 6 days. The reproductive success of the male was assessed by the presence or absence of pregnant females. At the same time, naive females, who did not participate in reproduction, assessed the urine of the successful males as more attractive, which was expressed in shorter Latency time of sniffs in the Olfactory test. Using a rapid headspace GC/MS analysis, we have found volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in male urine that correlated with female behavior. It turned out that these substances are derivatives of mouse pheromone 6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3-heptanone. The amplitude of peaks corresponding to this pheromone correlated with the testosterone level in blood and the weight of preputial glands. The amplitude of peaks increased in males after mating with whom the females turned out to be pregnant. It is important to note that body weight, weight of testes, weight of seminal vesicles, weight of preputial glands, and plasma testosterone level alone are not reliable indicators of male reproductive success. Thus, the content of the pheromone 6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3-heptanone in the urine of males can serve as a good predictor of the quality of the male as a sexual partner for female CD-1 mice.

1. Andersson M. Condition-dependent indicators in sexual selection: development of theory and tests. In: Lucas J.R., Simmons L.W. (Eds.) Essays in Animal Behaviour: Celebrating 50 Years of Animal Behaviour. Elsevier, 2006;253-267.

2. Arakawa H., Blanchard D.C., Arakawa K., Dunlap C., Blanchard R.J. Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2008;32(7):1236-1248. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.012.

3. Brennan P.A., Zufall F. Pheromonal communication in vertebrates. Nature. 2006;444(7117):308-315. DOI: 10.1038/nature05404.

4. Del Punta K., Leinders-Zufall T., Rodriguez I., Jukam D., Wysocki C.J., Ogawa S., Zufall F., Mombaerts P. Deficient pheromone responses in mice lacking a cluster of vomeronasal receptor genes. Nature. 2002;419(6902):70-74. DOI: 10.1038/nature00955.

5. Dougherty L.R. Designing mate choice experiments. Biol. Rev. 2020; 95(3):759-781. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12586.

6. Dougherty L.R., Shuker D.M. The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. 2015; 26(2):311-319. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru125.

7. Drickamer L.C. Behavioral selection of odor cues by young female mice affects age of puberty. Dev. Psychobiol. 1992;25(6):461-470. DOI: 10.1002/dev.420250606.

8. Drickamer L.C., Gowaty P.A., Holmes C.M. Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim. Behav. 2000;59(2):371-378. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1316.

9. Drickamer L.C., Gowaty P.A., Wagner D.M. Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim. Behav. 2003;65(1):105-114. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2002.2027.

10. Gerlinskaya L.A., Shnayder E.P., Dotsenko A.S., Maslennikova S.O., Zavjalov E.L., Moshkin M.P. Antigen-induced changes in odor attractiveness and reproductive output in male mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2012;26(5):451-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.11.010.

11. Gowaty P.A., Anderson W.W., Bluhm C.K., Drickamer L.C., Kim Y.K., Moore A.J. The hypothesis of reproductive compensation and its assumptions about mate preferences and offspring viability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104(38):15023-15027. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0706622104.

12. Harvey S., Wiesler D., Novotny M. Formation of cyclic enol ethers from a labile biological precursor: an example of analytical artifacts. J. Chromatogr. 1989;491(1):27-36. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)82816-9.

13. Hurst J.L., Beynon R.J. Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. Bioessays. 2004;26(12):1288-1298. DOI: 10.1002/bies.20147.

14. Ilmonen P., Stundner G., Thoß M., Penn D.J. Females prefer the scent of outbred males: good-genes-as-heterozygosity? BMC Evol. Biol. 2009;9:104. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-104.

15. Jemiolo B., Alberts J., Sochinski-Wiggins S., Harvey S., Novotny M. Behavioral and endocrine responses of female mice to synthetic analogues of volatile compounds in male urine. Anim. Behav. 1985; 33(4):1114-1118. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80170-6.

16. Jemiolo B., Harvey S., Novotny M. Promotion of the Whitten effect in female mice by synthetic analogs of male urinary constituents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1986;83(12):4576-4579. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4576.

17. Jemiolo B., Andreolini F., Wiesler D., Novotny M. Variations in mouse (Mus musculus) urinary volatiles during different periods of pregnancy and lactation. J. Chem. Ecol. 1987;13(9):1941-1956. DOI: 10.1007/BF01014677.

18. Jemiolo B., Xie T.M., Novotny M. Socio-sexual olfactory preference in female mice: attractiveness of synthetic chemosignals. Physiol. Behav. 1991;50(6):1119-1122. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90570-E.

19. Kavaliers M., Colwell D.D. Discrimination by female mice between the odours of parasitized and non-parasitized males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1995;261(1360):31-35. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0113.

20. Kokko H. Fisherian and “good genes” benefits of mate choice: how (not) to distinguish between them. Ecol. Lett. 2001;4(4):322-326. DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00224.x.

21. Lin D.Y., Zhang S.Z., Block E., Katz L.C. Encoding social signals in the mouse main olfactory bulb. Nature. 2005;434(7032):470-477. DOI: 10.1038/nature03414.

22. Liu Y.J., Guo H.F., Zhang J.X., Zhang Y.H. Quantitative inheritance of volatile pheromones and darcin and their interaction in olfactory preferences of female mice. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):2094. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02259-1.

23. Lombardi J.R., Vandenbergh J.G. Pheromonally induced sexual maturation in females: regulation by the social environment of the male. Science. 1977;196(4289):545-546. DOI: 10.1126/science.557838.

24. Ma W., Miao Z., Novotny M.V. Induction of estrus in grouped female mice (Mus domesticus) by synthetic analogues of preputial gland constituents. Chem. Senses. 1999;24(3):289-293. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/24.3.289.

25. Makas A.L., Troshkov M.L. Field gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for fast analysis. J. Chromatogr. B. 2004;800(1-2):55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.08.054.

26. Manser A., König B., Lindholm A.K. Female house mice avoid fertilization by t haplotype incompatible males in a mate choice experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 2015;28(1):54-64. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12525.

27. Moncho-Bogani J., Lanuza E., Hernández A., Novejarque A., Martı́nez-Garcı́a F. Attractive properties of sexual pheromones in mice: innate or learned? Physiol. Behav. 2002;77(1):167-176. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00842-9.

28. Moshkin M.P., Kolosova I.E., Novikov E.A., Litvinova E.A., Mershieva L.V., Mak V.V., Petrovskii D.V. Co-modulation of the immune function and the reproductive chemosignals. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;14:43-51.

29. Moshkin M.P., Gerlinskaya L.A., Morozova O., Bakhvalova V., Evsikov V. Behaviour, chemosignals and endocrine functions in male mice infected with tick-borne encephalitis virus. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002;27(5):603-608. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00096-8.

30. Nelson A.C., Colson K.E., Harmon S., Potts W.K. Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013;13:81. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-81.

31. Novotny M., Harvey S., Jemiolo B., Alberts J. Synthetic pheromones that promote inter-male aggression in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1985;82(7):2059-2061. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.7.2059.

32. Novotny M., Harvey S., Jemiolo B. Chemistry of male dominance in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Experientia. 1990;46(1):109-113. DOI: 10.1007/BF01955433.

33. Novotny M.V., Jemiolo B., Wiesler D., Ma W., Harvey S., Xu F., Xie T., Carmack M. A unique urinary constituent, 6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3-heptanone, is a pheromone that accelerates puberty in female mice. Chem. Biol. 1999a;6(6):377-383. DOI: 10.1016/S1074-5521(99)80049-0.

34. Novotny M.V., Ma W., Wiesler D., Zidek L. Positive identification of the puberty-accelerating pheromone of the house mouse: the volatile ligands associating with the major urinary protein. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1999b;266(1432):2017-2022. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0880.

35. Novotny M.V., Soini H.A., Koyama S., Wiesler D., Bruce K.E., Penn D.J. Chemical identification of MHC-influenced volatile compounds in mouse urine. I: Quantitative proportions of major chemosignals. J. Chem. Ecol. 2007;33(2):417-434. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-006-9230-9.

36. Osada K., Yamazaki K., Curran M., Bard J., Smith B.P., Beauchamp G.K. The scent of age. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2003;270(1518):929-933. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2308.

37. Osada K., Tashiro T., Mori K., Izumi H. The identification of attractive volatiles in aged male mouse urine. Chem. Senses. 2008;33(9):815-823. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn045.

38. Parkening T.A., Collins T.J., Au W.W. Paternal age and its effects on reproduction in C57BL/6NNia mice. J. Gerontol. 1988;43(3): B79-B84. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/43.3.B79.

39. Penn D.J., Potts W.K. Untrained mice discriminate MHC-determined odors. Physiol. Behav. 1998;64(3):235-243. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00052-3.

40. Raveh S., Sutalo S., Thonhauser K.E., Thoß M., Hettyey A., Winkelser F., Penn D.J. Female partner preferences enhance offspring ability to survive an infection. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014;14:14. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-14.

41. Roberts S.C., Gosling L.M. Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nat. Genet. 2003;35(1):103-106. DOI: 10.1038/ng1231.

42. Röck F., Hadeler K.P., Rammensee H.G., Overath P. Quantitative analysis of mouse urine volatiles: in search of MHC-dependent differences. PLoS One. 2007;2(5):e429. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000429.

43. Schaefer M.L., Wongravee K., Holmboe M.E., Heinrich N.M., Dixon S.J., Zeskind J.E., Kulaga H.M., Brereton R.G., Reed R.R., Trevejo J.M. Mouse urinary biomarkers provide signatures of maturation, diet, stress level, and diurnal rhythm. Chem. Senses. 2010; 35(6):459-471. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjq032.

44. Schwende F.J., Wiesler D., Jorgenson J.W., Carmack M., Novotny M. Urinary volatile constituents of the house mouse, Mus musculus, and their endocrine dependency. J. Chem. Ecol. 1986;12(1):277-296. DOI: 10.1007/BF01045611.

45. Varshavi D., Scott F.H., Varshavi D., Veeravalli S., Phillips I.R., Veselkov K., Strittmatter N., Takats Z., Shephard E.A., Everett J.R. Metabolic biomarkers of ageing in C57BL/6J wild-type and flavin-containing monooxygenase 5 (FMO5)-knockout mice. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2018;5:28. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00028.

46. Veyrac A., Wang G., Baum M.J., Bakker J. The main and accessory olfactory systems of female mice are activated differentially by dominant versus subordinate male urinary odors. Brain Res. 2011; 1402:20-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.035.

47. Whitten W.K., Bronson F.H., Greenstein J.A. Estrus-inducing pheromone of male mice: transport by movement of air. Science. 1968; 161(3841):584-585. DOI: 10.1126/science.161.3841.5.

48. Willis C., Poulin R. Preference of female rats for the odours of nonparasitized males: the smell of good genes. Folia Parasitol. 2000; 47(1):6-10. DOI: 10.14411/fp.2000.002.

49. Zala S.M., Potts W.K., Penn D.J. Scent-marking displays provide honest signals of health and infection. Behav. Ecol. 2004;15(2):338-344. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh022.

50. Zala S.M., Bilak A., Perkins M., Potts W.K., Penn D.J. Female house mice initially shun infected males, but do not avoid mating with them. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2015;69:715-722. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1884-2.

51. Zhang J.X., Rao X.P., Sun L., Zhao C.H., Qin X.W. Putative chemical signals about sex, individuality, and genetic background in the preputial gland and urine of the house mouse (Mus musculus). Chem. Senses. 2007;32(3):293-303. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjl058.