Ontologies in modelling and analysing of big genetic data

To systematize and effectively use the huge volume of experimental data accumulated in the field of bioinformatics and biomedicine, new approaches based on ontologies are needed, including automated methods for semantic integration of heterogeneous experimental data, methods for creating large knowledge bases and self-interpreting methods for analyzing large heterogeneous data based on deep learning. The article briefly presents the features of the subject area (bioinformatics, systems biology, biomedicine), formal definitions of the concept of ontology and knowledge graphs, as well as examples of using ontologies for semantic integration of heterogeneous data and creating large knowledge bases, as well as interpreting the results of deep learning on big data. As an example of a successful project, the Gene Ontology knowledge base is described, which not only includes terminological knowledge and gene ontology annotations (GOA), but also causal influence models (GO-CAM). This makes it useful not only for genomic biology, but also for systems biology, as well as for interpreting large-scale experimental data. An approach to building large ontologies using design patterns is discussed, using the ontology of biological attributes (OBA) as an example. Here, most of the classification is automatically computed based on previously created reference ontologies using automated inference, except for a small number of high-level concepts. One of the main problems of deep learning is the lack of interpretability, since neural networks often function as “black boxes” unable to explain their decisions. This paper describes approaches to creating methods for interpreting deep learning models and presents two examples of self-explanatory ontology-based deep learning models: (1) Deep GONet, which integrates Gene Ontology into a hierarchical neural network architecture, where each neuron represents a biological function. Experiments on cancer diagnostic datasets show that Deep GONet is easily interpretable and has high performance in distinguishing cancerous and non-cancerous samples. (2) ONN4MST, which uses biome ontologies to trace microbial sources of samples whose niches were previously poorly studied or unknown, detecting microbial contaminants. ONN4MST can distinguish samples from ontologically similar biomes, thus offering a quantitative way to characterize the evolution of the human gut microbial community. Both examples demonstrate high performance and interpretability, making them valuable tools for analyzing and interpreting big data in biology.

1. Adadi A., Berrada M. Peeking inside the Black-Box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138-52160. doi 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052

2. Bergmann F.T., Czauderna T., Dogrusoz U., Rougny A., Drager A., Toure V., Mazein A., Blinov M.L., Luna A. Systems biology graphical notation markup language (SBGNML) version 0.3. J. Integr. Bioinform. 2020;17(2-3):20200016. doi 10.1515/jib-2020-0016

3. Bourgeais V., Zehraoui F., Ben Hamdoune M., Hanczar B. Deep GONet: self-explainable deep neural network based on Gene Ontology for phenotype prediction from gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2021;22(S10):455. doi 10.1186/s12859-021-04370-7

4. Callahan T.J., Tripodi I.J., Stefanski A.L., Cappelletti L., Taneja S.B., Wyrwa J.M., Casiraghi E., Matentzoglu N.A., Reese J., Silverstein J.C., Hoyt C.T., Boyce R.D., Malec S.A., Unni D.R., Joachimiak M.P., Robinson P.N., Mungall C.J., Cavalleri E., Fontana T., Valentini G., Mesiti M., Gillenwater L.A., Santangelo B., Vasilevsky N.A., Hoehndorf R., Bennett T.D., Ryan P.B., Hripcsak G., Kahn M.G., Bada M., Baumgartner W.A., Hunter L.E. An open source knowledge graph ecosystem for the life sciences. Sci. Data. 2024;11(1):363. doi 10.1038/s41597-024-03171-w

5. Caufield J.H., Putman T., Schaper K., Unni D.R., Hegde H., Callahan T.J., Cappelletti L., Moxon S.A.T., Ravanmehr V., Carbon S., Chan L.E., Cortes K., Shefchek K.A., Elsarboukh G., Balhoff J., Fontana T., Matentzoglu N., Bruskiewich R.M., Thessen A.E., Harris N.L., Munoz-Torres M.C., Haendel M.A., Robinson P.N., Joachimiak M.P., Mungall C.J., Reese J.T. KG-Hub – building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(7): btad418. doi 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad418

6. Chandrasekaran B., Josephson J., Benjamins V. What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl. 1999;14(1):20-26. doi 10.1109/5254.747902

7. Cooper L., Jaiswal P. The plant ontology: a tool for plant genomics. In Edwards D. (Ed.) Plant Bioinformatics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1374. New York: Humana Press, 2016;89-114. doi 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_5

8. Dececchi T.A., Balhoff J.P., Lapp H., Mabee P.M. Toward synthesizing our knowledge of morphology: using ontologies and machine reasoning to extract presence/absence evolutionary phenotypes across studies. Syst. Biol. 2015;64(6):936-952. doi 10.1093/sysbio/syv031

9. Diehl A.D., Meehan T.F., Bradford Y.M., Brush M.H., Dahdul W.M., Dougall D.S., He Y., Osumi-Sutherland D., Ruttenberg A., Sarntivijai S., Van Slyke C.E., Vasilevsky N.A., Haendel M.A., Blake J.A., Mungall C.J. The Cell Ontology 2016: enhanced content, modularization, and ontology interoperability. J. Biomed. Semantics. 2016; 7(1):44. doi 10.1186/s13326-016-0088-7

10. Gkoutos G.V., Schofield P.N., Hoehndorf R. The anatomy of phenotype ontologies: principles, properties and applications. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(5):1008-1021. doi 10.1093/bib/bbx035

11. Gupta M., Cotter A., Pfeifer J., Voevodski K., Canini K., Mangylov A., Moczydlowski W., van Esbroeck A. Monotonic calibrated interpolated look-up tables. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016;17:1-47

12. Hastings J., Owen G., Dekker A., Ennis M., Kale N., Muthukrishnan V., Turner S., Swainston N., Mendes P., Steinbeck C. ChEBI in 2016: improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D1214-D1219. doi 10.1093/nar/gkv1031

13. Huntley R.P., Sawford T., Mutowo-Meullenet P., Shypitsyna A., Bonilla C., Martin M.J., O’Donovan C. The GOA database: Gene Ontology annotation updates for 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(D1):D1057-D1063. doi 10.1093/nar/gku1113

14. Ivanisenko V.A., Saik O.V., Ivanisenko N.V., Tiys E.S., Ivanisenko T.V., Demenkov P.S., Kolchanov N.A. ANDSystem: an Associative Network Discovery System for automated literature mining in the field of biology. BMC Syst. Biol. 2015;9(Suppl.2):S2. doi 10.1186/1752-0509-9-S2-S2

15. Ivanisenko V.A., Demenkov P.S., Ivanisenko T.V., Mishchenko E.L., Saik O.V. A new version of the ANDSystem tool for automatic extraction of knowledge from scientific publications with expanded functionality for reconstruction of associative gene networks by considering tissue-specific gene expression. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20(Suppl.1):34. doi 10.1186/s12859-018-2567-6

16. Li Y., Huang C., Ding L., Li Z., Pan Y., Gao X. Deep learning in bioinformatics: introduction, application, and perspective in big data era. Methods. 2019;166:4-21. doi 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.008

17. Livingston K.M., Bada M., Baumgartner W.A., Hunter L.E. KaBOB: ontology-based semantic integration of biomedical databases. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16(1):126. doi 10.1186/s12859-015-0559-3

18. Lobentanzer S., Aloy P., Baumbach J., Bohar B., Carey V.J., Charoentong P., Danhauser K., Doğan T., Dreo J., Dunham I., Farr E., Fernandez-Torras A., Gyori B.M., Hartung M., Hoyt C.T., Klein C., Korcsmaros T., Maier A., Mann M., Ochoa D., Pareja-Lorente E., Popp F., Preusse M., Probul N., Schwikowski B., Sen B., Strauss M.T., Turei D., Ulusoy E., Waltemath D., Wodke J.A.H., Saez-Rodriguez J. Democratizing knowledge representation with BioCypher. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023;41(8):1056-1059. doi 10.1038/s41587-023-01848-y

19. Lou Y., Caruana R., Gehrke J., Hooker G. Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. New York: Assoc. for Computing Machinery, 2013;623-631. doi 10.1145/2487575.2487579

20. Mungall C.J., Torniai C., Gkoutos G.V., Lewis S.E., Haendel M.A. Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biol. 2012;13(1):R5. doi 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r5

21. Osumi-Sutherland D., Courtot M., Balhoff J., Mungall C. Dead simple OWL design patterns. J. Biomed. Semant. 2017;8:18. doi 10.1186/s13326-017-0126-0

22. Podkolodnyy N.L., Ignatyeva E.V., Podkolodnaya O.A., Kolchanov N.A. Information support of research on transcriptional regulatory mechanisms: an ontological approach. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2012; 16(4/1):742-755 (in Russian)

23. Podkolodnyy N.L., Podkolodnaya O.A. Ontologies in bioinformatics and systems biology. Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res. 2016;6(7):749-758. doi 10.1134/S2079059716070091

24. Qaiser A., Ghulam S. Bioinformatics and big data analytics in genomic research. Med. Pap. 2023;3(1):165-179. doi 10.31219/osf.io/5grpc

25. Santos A., Colaço A.R., Nielsen A.B., Niu L., Strauss M., Geyer P.E., Coscia F., Albrechtsen N.J.W., Mundt F., Jensen L.J., Mann M. A knowledge graph to interpret clinical proteomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;40(5):692-702. doi 10.1038/s41587-021-01145-6

26. Sapoval N., Aghazadeh A., Nute M.G., Antunes D.A., Balaji A., Baraniuk R., Barberan C.J., Dannenfelser R., Dun C., Edrisi M., Elworth R.A.L., Kille B., Kyrillidis A., Nakhleh L., Wolfe C.R., Yan Z., Yao V., Treangen T.J. Current progress and open challenges for applying deep learning across the biosciences. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):1728. doi 10.1038/s41467-022-29268-7

27. Slater L.T., Gkoutos G.V., Hoehndorf R. Towards semantic interoperability: finding and repairing hidden contradictions in biomedical ontologies. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2020;20(Suppl.10):311. doi 10.1186/s12911-020-01336-2

28. Smith B., Ceusters W., Klagges B., Kohler J., Kumar A., Lomax J., Mungall C., Neuhaus F., Rector A.L., Rosse C. Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 2005;6(5):R46. doi 10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r46

29. Stefancsik R., Balhoff J.P., Balk M.A., Ball R.L., Bello S.M., Caron A.R., Chesler E.J., de Souza V., Gehrke S., Haendel M., Harris L.W., Harris N.L., Ibrahim A., Koehler S., Matentzoglu N., McMurry J.A., Mungall C.J., Munoz-Torres M.C., Putman T., Robinson P., Smedley D., Sollis E., Thessen A.E., Vasilevsky N., Walton D.O., Osumi-Sutherland D. The Ontology of Biological Attributes (OBA)-computational traits for the life sciences. Mamm. Genome. 2023;34(3):364-378. doi 10.1007/s00335-023-09992-1

30. Stephens Z.D., Lee S.Y., Faghri F., Campbell R.H., Zhai C., Efron M.J., Iyer R., Schatz M.C., Sinha S., Robinson G.E. Big Data: astronomical or genomical? PLoS Biol. 2015;13(7):e1002195. doi 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002195

31. Thomas P.D., Hill D.P., Mi H., Osumi-Sutherland D., Van Auken K., Carbon S., Balhoff J.P., Albou L.-P., Good B., Gaudet P., Lewis S.E., Mungall C.J. Gene Ontology Causal Activity Modeling (GO-CAM) moves beyond GO annotations to structured descriptions of biological functions and systems. Nat. Genet. 2019;51(10):1429-1433. doi 10.1038/s41588-019-0500-1

32. Wood E.C., Glen A.K., Kvarfordt L.G., Womack F., Acevedo L., Yoon T.S., Ma C., Flores V., Sinha M., Chodpathumwan Y., Termehchy A., Roach J.C., Mendoza L., Hoffman A.S., Deutsch E.W., Koslicki D., Ramsey S.A. RTX-KG2: a system for building a semantically standardized knowledge graph for translational biomedicine. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022;23(1):400. doi 10.1186/s12859-022-04932-3

33. Zha Y., Ning K. Ontology-aware neural network: a general framework for pattern mining from microbiome data. Brief. Bioinform. 2022; 23(2):bbac005. doi 10.1093/bib/bbac005