A rare case of uniparental disomy 9 concomitant with low-level mosaicism
https://doi.org/10.18699/vjgb-25-68
Abstract
Uniparental disomy of chromosome 9, in combination with low-level mosaicism for chromosome 9, represents a rare chromosomal disorder. One of the mechanisms underlying the formation of uniparental disomy is the trisomy rescue, which concurrently results in low-level mosaicism. The diagnosis of mosaic aneuploidies poses significant challenges due to the limited sensitivity and resolution of conventional cytogenetic methods, which often fail to detect low-level mosaicism. Additionally, the variable distribution of cell lines within the patient’s tissues, as well as the heterogeneity of samples derived from the same tissue, complicates the precise determination of the impact of mosaic trisomy on the phenotypic expression. Phenotypic manifestations associated with mosaic trisomy 9 are characterized by considerable variability. During the prenatal period, intrauterine growth restriction is frequently observed in cases of this chromosomal abnormality, although this finding is not pathognomonic for the condition. In liveborn infants with trisomy 9 mosaicism, characteristic phenotypic features may include craniofacial anomalies (such as micrognathia and ear malformations), scoliosis, low-set ears, feeding and respiratory difficulties, hip dysplasia, seizures, and developmental delays. To establish a diagnosis in a patient presenting with multiple dysembryogenic stigmata and psychomotor retardation, a comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis was conducted. This included high-resolution chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using targeted DNA probes. CMA identified regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome 9, indicative of uniparental disomy, and suggested the presence of low-level mosaicism for trisomy 9. Subsequent FISH analysis of cultured lymphocytes, employing DNA probes specific to various regions of chromosome 9, confirmed the low-level mosaicism for trisomy 9. The results of our study are consistent with the idea that mosaicism for chromosome 9, particularly when combined with uniparental disomy, constitutes a complex genetic anomaly that can lead to a spectrum of phenotypic manifestations, including developmental delay, growth abnormalities, and behavioral anomalies. CMA and FISH are highly effective methods for the diagnosis of uniparental disomy and low-level mosaicism involving chromosome 9.
About the Authors
A. S. IakovlevaRussian Federation
Moscow
Zh. G. Markova
Russian Federation
Moscow
L. A. Bessonova
Russian Federation
Moscow
N. V. Shilova
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Benn P., Grati F.R. Aneuploidy in first trimester chorionic villi and spontaneous abortions: windows into the origin and fate of aneu ploidy through embryonic and fetal development. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(5):519-524. doi: 10.1002/pd.5795
2. Björck E.J., Anderlid B.M., Blennow E. Maternal isodisomy of chro mosome 9 with no impact on the phenotype in a woman with two isochromosomes: i(9p) and i(9q). Am J Med Genet. 1999;87(1): 49-52. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19991105)87:1<49::aid-ajmg10>3.0.co;2-4
3. Bruns D.A., Campbell E. Twenty-five additional cases of trisomy 9 mosaic: birth information, medical conditions, and developmental status. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36977
4. Cantú E.S., Eicher D.J., Pai G.S., Donahue C.J., Harley R.A. Mosaic vs. nonmosaic trisomy 9: report of a liveborn infant evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62(4):330-335. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960424)62:4<330::AID-AJMG1>3.0.CO;2-V
5. Cassidy S.B., Schwartz S. Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes. Disorders of genomic imprinting. Medicine (Baltimore). 1998;77(2): 140-151. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199803000-00005
6. Chen C.P., Chern S.R., Wu P.S., Chen S.W., Wu F.T., Chen L.F., Chen Y.Y., Wang W. Detection of maternal uniparental disomy 9 in association with low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with intrauterine growth restriction, abnormal first-trimester screening result (low PAPP-A and low PlGF), maternal preeclampsia and a favorable outcome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(1):141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.11.024
7. Chen C.P., Ko T.M., Chen S.W., Chern S.R., Wu F.T., Pan Y.T., Pan C.W., Chen Y.Y., Wang W. Low-level mosaic trisomy 9 at amniocentesis associated with a positive noninvasive prenatal testing for trisomy 9, maternal uniparental disomy 9, intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable fetal outcome in a pregnancy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(3):457-460. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2023.03.008
8. Chen Q., Chen Y., Shi L., Tao Y., Li X., Zhu X., Yang Y., Xu W. Uniparental disomy: expanding the clinical and molecular phenotypes of whole chromosomes. Front Genet. 2023;14:1232059. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1232059
9. Del Gaudio D., Shinawi M., Astbury C., Tayeh M.K., Deak K.L., Raca G.; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Diagnostic testing for uniparental disomy: a points to consider statement from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2020;22(7):1133-1141. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0782-9
10. Eggermann T., Soellner L., Buiting K., Kotzot D. Mosaicism and uniparental disomy in prenatal diagnosis. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21(2): 77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.11.010
11. Eggermann T., Mackay D.J.G., Tümer Z. Uniparental disomy and imprinting disorders. OBM Genetics. 2018;2(3):031. doi: 10.21926/obm.genet.1803031
12. Engel E. Un nouveau concept genetique: la disomie uniparentale et son corollaire eventuel, l’isodisomie [A new genetic concept: the uniparental disomy and its potential effect, the isodisomy (author’s transl.)]. J Genet Hum. 1980;28(1):11-22 (in French)
13. Fritz B., Aslan M., Kalscheuer V., Ramsing M., Saar K., Fuchs B., Rehder H. Low incidence of UPD in spontaneous abortions beyond the 5<sup>th</sup> gestational week. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(12):910-916. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200741
14. Kotzot D. Review and metaanalysis of systematic searches for uniparental disomy (UPD) other than UPD 15. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111(4):366-375. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10569
15. Lee C.Y., Su H.J., Cheng Y.T., Ku Y.L., Ngo Y.G., Chen C.M., Ou Y.C., Lee M.C., Shaw S.W.S. Detection of fetal trisomy 9 mosaicism by noninvasive prenatal testing through maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(4):594-597. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.021
16. Li D., Wang Y., Zhao N., Chang L., Liu P., Tian C., Qiao J. A case report and mechanism analysis of a normal phenotype mosaic 47, XXY complicated by paternal iUPD (9) who had a normal PGD result. BMC Med Genet. 2019;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12881-019-0897-5
17. Li M., Glass J., Du X., Dubbs H., Harr M.H., Falk M., Smolarek T., Hopkin R.J., Zackai E., Sheppard S.E. Trisomy 9 mosaic syndrome: sixteen additional patients with new and/or less commonly reported features, literature review, and suggested clinical guidelines. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185(8):2374-2383. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62251
18. Liehr T. Cytogenetic contribution to uniparental disomy (UPD). Mol Cytogenet. 2010;3:8. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-3-8
19. Ma J., Cram D.S., Zhang J., Shang L., Yang H., Pan H. Birth of a child with trisomy 9 mosaicism syndrome associated with paternal isodisomy 9: case of a positive noninvasive prenatal test result unconfirmed by invasive prenatal diagnosis. Mol Cytogenet. 2015;8:44. doi: 10.1186/s13039-015-0145-4
20. Ma N., Zhu Z., Hu J., Pang J., Yang S., Liu J., Chen J., Tang W., Kuang H., Hu R., Li Z., Wang H., Peng Y., Xi H. Case report: detection of fetal trisomy 9 mosaicism by multiple genetic testing methods: report of two cases. Front Genet. 2023;14:1121121. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1121121
21. Malvestiti F., Agrati C., Grimi B., Pompilii E., Izzi C., Martinoni L., Gaetani E., Liuti M.R., Trotta A., Maggi F., Simoni G., Grati F.R. Interpreting mosaicism in chorionic villi: results of a monocentric series of 1001 mosaics in chorionic villi with follow-up amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(11):1117-1127. doi: 10.1002/pd.4656
22. Nakka P., Pattillo Smith S., O’Donnell-Luria A.H., McManus K.F.; 23andMe Research Team; Mountain J.L., Ramachandran S., Sathirapongsasuti J.F. Characterization of prevalence and health conse quences of uniparental disomy in four million individuals from the general population. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105(5):921-932. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.09.016
23. Quan F., Janas J., Toth-Fejel S., Johnson D.B., Wolford J.K., Popovich B.W. Uniparental disomy of the entire X chromosome in a female with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 1997; 60(1):160-165
24. Spence J.E., Perciaccante R.G., Greig G.M., Willard H.F., Ledbetter D.H., Hejtmancik J.F., Pollack M.S., O’Brien W.E., Beaudet A.L. Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;42(2):217-226
25. Sulisalo T., Mäkitie O., Sistonen P., Ridanpää M., el-Rifai W., Ruuskanen O., de la Chapelle A., Kaitila I. Uniparental disomy in cartilagehair hypoplasia. Eur J Hum Genet. 1997;5(1):35-42. doi: 10.1007/BF03405875
26. Tiranti V., Lamantea E., Uziel G., Zeviani M., Gasparini P., Marzella R., Rocchi M., Fried M. Leigh syndrome transmitted by uniparental disomy of chromosome 9. J Med Genet. 1999;36(12): 927-928
27. Willatt L.R., Davison B.C., Goudie D., Alexander J., Dyson H.M., Jenks P.E., Ferguson-Smith M.E. A male with trisomy 9 mo saicism and maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 9 in the euploid cell line. J Med Genet. 1992;29(10):742-744. doi: 10.1136/jmg.29.10.742
28. Xiao B., Wang L., Liu H., Fan Y., Xu Y., Sun Y., Qiu W. Uniparental isodisomy caused autosomal recessive diseases: NGSbased analysis allows the concurrent detection of homogenous variants and copyneutral loss of heterozygosity. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019; 7(10):e00945. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.945
29. Yang Y., Muzny D.M., Xia F., Niu Z., Person R., Ding Y., Ward P., … Beaudet A.L., Lupski J.R., Plon S.E., Gibbs R.A., Eng C.M. Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA. 2014;312(18):1870-1879. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14601