Preview

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Advanced search

In vitro analysis of the effects of intronic variants c.940+3_940+6del, c.941-3C>G, and c.2389+5G>A in the LDLR gene on pre-mRNA splicing using a minigene assay

Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal codominant disorder characterized by impaired clearance of low-density lipoproteins from the bloodstream, markedly elevated plasma total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and early onset of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. FH is one of the most common monogenic disorders in humans. The majority of FH cases are caused by pathogenic variants in three genes: LDLR (OMIM: 143890), APOB (OMIM: 107730), and PCSK9 (OMIM: 607786). More than 80 % of FH cases are associated with mutations in the LDLR gene, located on chromosome 19. In 25–75 % of patients with a clinical FH phenotype, no pathogenic variant is identified in these genes. Whole-exome sequencing and targeted gene panel sequencing of the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, and LDLRAP1 genes were performed in patients with an FH phenotype, followed by confirmation of the identified variants by Sanger sequencing. Three unrelated probands were found to carry intronic LDLR variants for which functional evidence was previously unavailable. The aim of this study was to functionally assess in vitro the effects of three intronic LDLR variants (NM_000527.5: c.940+3_940+6del, c.941-3C>G, and c.2389+5G>A) on pre-mRNA splicing using a minigene assay. Minigene constructs encompassing target exons with flanking intronic sequences were generated and transfected into the HEK293 and HeLa cell lines. The deleterious effect of all three variants on pre-mRNA splicing was confirmed. The fournucleotide deletion c.940+3_940+6del resulted in two aberrant transcripts: inclusion of six nucleotides from intron 6 and complete retention of the minigene intronic sequence. The c.941-3C>G variant caused loss of the canonical acceptor splice site and activation of a cryptic site, with inclusion of intronic nucleotides from intron 6. The c.2389+5G>A variant resulted in exon 16 skipping. Functional in vitro analysis is a key tool for the molecular verification of intronic variants of uncertain clinical significance and, in conjunction with clinical data, supports the establishment of a definitive molecular diagnosis.

About the Authors

V. Yu. Danilchenko
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


D. E. Ivanoshchuk
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Novosibirsk



O. V. Timoshchenko
Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine – Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Novosibirsk



E. A. Panina
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


P. S. Orlov
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Novosibirsk



E. V. Shakhtshneider
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Novosibirsk



References

1. Abramowicz A., Gos M. Splicing mutations in human genetic disorders: examples, detection, and confirmation. J Appl Genet. 2018;59(3): 253-268. doi 10.1007/s13353-018-0444-7

2. Ahmad Z., Agarwala A., Cuchel M., Barton Duell P., Hegele R.A., Hudgins L., Jamison A., … Soffer D.E., Warden B.A., Weintraub W.S., Williams L., Goldberg A.C. Update on familial hypercholesterol emia: an expert clinical consensus from the National Lipid Asso ciation. J Clin Lipidol. 2026;20(4):708-737. doi 10.1016/j.jacl.2026.01.011

3. Amsellem S., Briffaut D., Carrié A., Rabès J.P., Girardet J.P., Fredenrich A., Moulin P., Krempf M., Reznik Y., Vialettes B., de Gennes J.L., Brukert E., Benlian P. Intronic mutations outside of Alu-repeat-rich domains of the LDL receptor gene are a cause of familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Genet. 2002;111(6):501-510. doi 10.1007/s00439-002-0813-4

4. Austin M.A., Hutter C.M., Zimmern R.L., Humphries S.E. Genetic causes of monogenic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a HuGE prevalence review. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(5):407-420. doi 10.1093/aje/kwh236

5. Benito-Vicente A., Alves A.C., Etxebarria A., Medeiros A.M., Martin C., Bourbon M. The importance of an integrated analysis of clinical, molecular, and functional data for the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Genet Med. 2015;17(12):980-988. doi 10.1038/gim.2015.14

6. Blakes A.J.M., Wai H.A., Davies I., Moledina H.E., Ruiz A., Thomas T., Bunyan D., … Douglas A.G.L.; Genomics England Research Consortium, Splicing and Disease Working Group; Whiffin N., Baralle D., Lord J. A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. Genome Med. 2022;14(1):79. doi 10.1186/s13073-022-01087-x

7. Bourbon M., Duarte M.A., Alves A.C., Medeiros A.M., Marques L., Soutar A.K. Genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia: the importance of functional analysis of potential splice-site mutations. J Med Genet. 2009;46(5):352-357. doi 10.1136/jmg.2007.057000

8. Brown M.S., Goldstein J.L. Receptor-mediated endocytosis: insights from the lipoprotein receptor system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76(7):3330-3337. doi 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3330

9. Chong R., Insigne K.D., Yao D., Burghard C.P., Wang J., Hsiao Y.E., Jones E.M., Goodman D.B., Xiao X., Kosuri S. A multiplexed assay for exon recognition reveals that an unappreciated fraction of rare genetic variants cause large-effect splicing disruptions. Mol Cell. 2019;73(1):183-194.e8. doi 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.037

10. Chora J.R., Iacocca M.A., Tichý L., Wand H., Kurtz C.L., Zimmermann H., Leon A., … Hegele R.A., Freiberger T., Knowles J.W., Bourbon M.; ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant Curation Expert Panel consensus guidelines for LDLR variant classification. Genet Med. 2022;24(2):293-306. doi 10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012

11. Cooper T.A. Use of minigene systems to dissect alternative splicing elements. Methods. 2005;37(4):331-340. doi 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005. 07.015

12. Etxebarria A., Palacios L., Stef M., Tejedor D., Uribe K.B., Oleaga A., Irigoyen L., Torres B., Ostolaza H., Martin C. Functional characterization of splicing and ligand-binding domain variants in the LDL receptor. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(1):232-243. doi 10.1002/humu.21630

13. Ezhov M.V., Bazhan S.S., Ershova A.I., Meshkov A.N., Sokolov A.A., Kukharchuk V.V., Gurevich V.S., … Balakhonova T.V., Filippov A.E., Akhmejanov N.M., Aleksandrova O.Yu., Lipovetskiy B.M. Clinical guidelines for familial hypercholesterolemia. Ateroscleroz. 2019;15(1):58-98 (in Russian)

14. Freiberger T. Update on genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2026;37(2):38-44. doi 10.1097/MOL.0000000000001027

15. Hobbs H.H., Russell D.W., Brown M.S., Goldstein J.L. The LDL receptor locus in familial hypercholesterolemia: mutational analysis of a membrane protein. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:133-170. doi 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.001025

16. Holla Ø.L., Nakken S., Mattingsdal M., Ranheim T., Berge K.E., Defesche J.C., Leren T.P. Effects of intronic mutations in the LDLR gene on pre-mRNA splicing: comparison of wet-lab and bioinformatics analyses. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;96(4):245-252. doi 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.12.014

17. Hu P., Dharmayat K.I., Stevens C.A.T., Sharabiani M.T.A., Jones R.S., Watts G.F., Genest J., Ray K.K., Vallejo-Vaz A.J. Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia among the general population and patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2020;141(22):1742-1759. doi 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044795

18. Jenkins J.L., Agrawal A.A., Gupta A., Green M.R., Kielkopf C.L. U2AF65 adapts to diverse pre-mRNA splice sites through conformational selection of specific and promiscuous RNA recognition motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(6):3859-3873. doi 10.1093/nar/gkt046

19. Kulseth M.A., Berge K.E., Bogsrud M.P., Leren T.P. Analysis of LDLR mRNA in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia revealed a novel mutation in intron 14, which activates a cryptic splice site. J Hum Genet. 2010;55(10):676-680. doi 10.1038/jhg.2010.87

20. Liguori R., Bianco A.M., Argiriou A., Pauciullo P., Giannino A., Rubba P., De Simone V. LDL receptor cDNA sequence analysis in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: 5 novel mutations with high prevalence in families originating from southern Italy. Hum Mutat. 2001;17(5):433. doi 10.1002/humu.1122

21. Malard F., Mackereth C.D., Campagne S. Principles and correction of 5′-splice site selection. RNA Biol. 2022;19(1):943-960. doi 10.1080/15476286.2022.2100971

22. Marduel M., Carrié A., Sassolas A., Devillers M., Carreau V., Di Filippo M., Erlich D., … Junien C.; French ADH Research Network; Boileau C., Varret M., Rabès J.P. Molecular spectrum of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in France. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(11): E1811-E1824. doi 10.1002/humu.21348

23. Martín-Campos J.M., Plana N., Figueras R., Ibarretxe D., Caixàs A., Esteve E., Pérez A., … Pintó X., Masana L., Julve J., Blanco-Vaca F.; Xarxa d’Unitats de Lípids i Arteriosclerosi (XULA). Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in Catalonia: correspondence between clinical-biochemical and genetic diagnostics in 967 patients studied in a multicenter clinical setting. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(6):14521462. doi 10.1016/j.jacl.2018.09.002

24. Meshkov A., Ershova A., Kiseleva A., Zotova E., Sotnikova E., Petukhova A., Zharikova A., … Makarov V., Kukharchuk V., Boytsov S., Yudin S., Drapkina O. The LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 variants of index patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Russia. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(1):66. doi 10.3390/genes12010066

25. Miroshnikova V.V., Romanova O.V., Ivanova O.N., Fedyakov M.A., Panteleeva A.A., Barbitoff Y.A., Muzalevskaya M.V., … Guseva D.M., Pchelina S.N., Glotov A.S., Zakharova E.Y., Glotov O.S. Identification of novel variants in the LDLR gene in Russian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia using targeted sequencing. Biomed Rep. 2021;14(1):15. doi 10.3892/br.2020.1391

26. Nazarenko M.S., Sleptcov A.A., Zarubin A.A., Salakhov R.R., Shevchenko A.I., Tmoyan N.A., Elisaphenko E.A., Zubkova E.S., Zheltysheva N.V., Ezhov M.V., Kukharchuk V.V., Parfyonova Yu.V., Zakian S.M., Zakharova I.S. Calling and phasing of single-nucleotide and structural variants of the LDLR gene using Oxford Nanopore MinION. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4471. doi 10.3390/ijms 24054471

27. Nordestgaard B.G., Chapman M.J., Humphries S.E., Ginsberg H.N., Masana L., Descamps O.S., Wiklund O., … Stalenhoef A.F., Stroes E., Taskinen M.R., Tybjærg-Hansen A.; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(45):3478-3490. doi 10.1093/eurheartj/eht273

28. Okonechnikov K., Golosova O., Fursov M. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(8):1166-1167. doi 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091

29. Reeskamp L.F., Hartgers M.L., Peter J., Dallinga-Thie G.M., Zuurbier L., Defesche J.C., Grefhorst A., Hovingh G.K. A deep intronic variant in LDLR in familial hypercholesterolemia. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018;11(12):e002385. doi 10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002385

30. Reeskamp L.F., Balvers M., Peter J., van de Kerkhof L., Klaaijsen L.N., Motazacker M.M., Grefhorst A., van Riel N.A.W., Hovingh G.K., Defesche J.C., Zuurbier L. Intronic variant screening with targeted next-generation sequencing reveals first pseudoexon in LDLR in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2021;321:14-20. doi 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.02.003

31. Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., Voelkerding K., Rehm H.L. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence va riants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-424. doi 10.1038/gim.2015.30

32. Rieck L., Bardey F., Grenkowitz T., Bertram L., Helmuth J., Mischung C., Spranger J., Steinhagen-Thiessen E., Bobbert T., Kassner U., Demuth I. Mutation spectrum and polygenic score in German patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Clin Genet. 2020; 98(5):457-467. doi 10.1111/cge.13826

33. Sambrook J., Russell D.W. Purification of nucleic acids by extraction with phenol:chloroform. CSH Protoc. 2006;2006(1):pdb.prot4455. doi 10.1101/pdb.prot4455

34. Segrest J.P., Jones M.K., De Loof H., Dashti N. Structure of apolipoprotein B-100 in low density lipoproteins. J Lipid Res. 2001;42(9): 1346-1367. doi 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)30267-4

35. Semenova A.E., Sergienko I.V., García-Giustiniani D., Monserrat L., Popova A.B., Nozadze D.N., Ezhov M.V. Verification of underlying genetic cause in a cohort of Russian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia using targeted next generation sequencing. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2020;7(2):16. doi 10.3390/jcdd7020016

36. Shakhtshneider E.V., Ivanoshchuk D.E., Makarenkova K.V., Orlov P.S., Timoshchenko O.V., Bazhan S.S., Nikitin Yu.P., Voev o da M.I. Cascade genetic screening in diagnostics of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: clinical case. Rossijskii Kardiologicheskii Zhur nal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;22(6):178-179. doi 10.15829/1560-4071-2017-6-178-179 (in Russian)

37. Shamsani J., Kazakoff S.H., Armean I.M., McLaren W., Parsons M.T., Thompson B.A., O’Mara T.A., Hunt S.E., Waddell N., Spurdle A.B. A plugin for the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor that uses MaxEntScan to predict variant spliceogenicity. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(13):2315-2317. doi 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty960

38. Südhof T.C., Goldstein J.L., Brown M.S., Russell D.W. The LDL receptor gene: a mosaic of exons shared with different proteins. Science. 1985;228(4701):815-822. doi 10.1126/science.2988123

39. Voith von Voithenberg L., Sánchez-Rico C., Kang H.S., Madl T., Zanier K., Barth A., Warner L.R., Sattler M., Lamb D.C. Recognition of the 3′ splice site RNA by the U2AF heterodimer involves a dynamic population shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(46):E7169E7175. doi 10.1073/pnas.1605873113

40. Vorechovský I. Aberrant 3′ splice sites in human disease genes: mutation pattern, nucleotide structure and comparison of computational tools that predict their utilization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(16): 4630-4641. doi 10.1093/nar/gkl535

41. Walker L.C., de la Hoya M., Wiggins G.A.R., Lindy A., Vincent L.M., Parsons M.T., Canson D.M., … Pesaran T., Karam R., Harrison S.M., Spurdle A.B.; ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group. Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110(7):1046-1067. doi 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.002


Review

Views: 27

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)