Genetic diversity of soybean cultivars belonging to different ripeness groups with regard to performance and quality
https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ16.168
Abstract
Twenty six varieties of Kazakstani and 42 soybean breeding varieties from Russia, Ukraine, France, and Serbia have been studied. Depending on the length of the vegetation period from within 90–135 days, these varieties were divided into five ripeness groups. None of the Kazakstani varieties has been assigned to early season ripening group 00. Varietes in the mid-late and middle season ripening group, which are the most adapted to the cultivation conditions in the southeastern area of Kazahstan, showed the highest yield. Kazakstani varieties have been found superior to the others in average yield by 2.3 q/ha in mid-early group 0, by 3.6 q/ha in mid-late group II, and by 7.9 q/ha in late group III. The highest range of variation and the maximum level of protein collection was characteristic of the middleand of medium group. The amounts of protein and fat in the Kazakhstani and other varieties within the groups was found to be almost identical; at the same time, there was a notable positive correlation between precocity and high protein content. As a result, early-ripening soybean genotypes (groups 000 and 00) with promise for cultivation in the northern areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan have been identified and put together as a whole. The most productive Kazakstani variety was Zhansaya (included in the register of the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2012), which yielded 38.3–45.8 q/ha over the study period. High-protein variety Zara, with a protein content of 37.7 %–43.3 %, has been in variety testing in the Republic of Kazakhstan since 2011.
About the Authors
A. I. Abugaliyeva
Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Industry
Kazakhstan
Almalybak
Kazakhstan
Almalybak
S. V. Didorenko
Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Industry
Kazakhstan
Almalybak
Kazakhstan
Almalybak
References
1. Albrecht L.P., de Lucca B.A., Rizzatti A.M., Scapim C.A., Barbosa М.C., Stülp. M. Sementes de soja produzidas еm épocas de safrinha nа região oeste do Estado do Paraná. Acta Sci. Agron. 2009; 31(1):121-127.
2. Azhgaliev T.B., Abugalieva A.I., Zhumakhanova A.Zh. The soybean variety pool in Kazakhstan. Vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki Kazakhstana = Herald of the agricultural science of Kazakhstan. 2012;10:17-23.
3. Baranov V.F., Baranova L.A. On the possibility of soybean introduction in northwestern Russia. Maslichnye kultury. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy byulleten VNIIMK = Oil crops. Scientific and technical bulletin of the All-Russian Research Institute of Oil Crops. 2011;1:106-109.
4. Boyko A.T., Karyagin Yu.G. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Soya –vysokobelkovaya kultura [Guidelines. Soybean, a High-Protein Crop]. Almaty, Vita, 2004.
5. Butovets E.S. Study and employment of best soybean varieties from different regions in breeding programs of the Primorskiy Research Institute of Agriculture. Materialy 5 mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii «Rasteniya v musonnom klimate» [Proceedings of the 5th International Conference “Plants in the Monsoon Climate”]. Vladivostok, 2009:313.
6. Butovets E.S. Ecological trial of soybean varieties. Zemledelie = Agriculture. 2011;6:38-39.
7. Demyanova-Roy G.B., Boriova E.B. Assessment of the adaptive potential of soybean varieties on turf podzol of the Kostroma region. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki = Natural and Industrial Sciences. 2012;1:113-116.
8. Didorenko S.V. Soybean breeding achievements in Kazakhstan. Vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki Kazakhstana = Herald of the agricultural science of Kazakhstan. 2014;1:22-27.
9. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta [Technique of the Field Experiment]. Moscow, Kolos, 1973.
10. Fehr W.R., Cavines C.E. Stages of Soybean Development. Cooperative Extention Service. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Univ., 1979.
11. Goloenko D.V. Guidelines for choosing parental combinations for breeding early- ripening soybean varieties. Selektsiya i nasinnitstvo = Breeding and Seed Industry. 2006;92:79-87.
12. Helio B.B., Tuneo S., Cassia T.R., Rodrigo R.F., Damiao C.C., Silva R.M. Adaptation and stability of soybean genotypes in the test in the state of Mato Grosso. Rev. Сeres. Univ. Fed. Vicosa. 2010;3:359-366.
13. Khasbiullina O.I., Mudruk N.V., Butovets E.S. Comparison of highperformance soybean cultivars in the southern Russian Far East. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK = Achievements of Science and Technology of AIC. 2012:17-19.
14. Korsakov N.I., Makasheva R.Kh., Adamova O.P. Metodika izucheniya kollektsii zernobobovykh kultur [Мethods of the Study of the Grain Legume Collection]. Leningrad, Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry, 1968.
15. Medvedeva Z.M., Babarykina S.A. Features of the formation of soybean performance in West Siberia. Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta = Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. 2011;2:19-23.
16. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya selskokhozyaystvennykh kultur. Vyp. 2-y. Zernovye, zernobobovye, kukuruza i kormovye kultury. [Technique of State Crop Variety Trials. Issue 2. Cereals, Grain Legumes, Maize, and Fodder Crops]. Moscow, Kolos, 1971.
17. Omel’yanyuk L.V., Asanov A.M., Tanakulov A.Kh. Izuchenie sortoobraztsov soi mirovoy kollektsii VIR v usloviyakh Sibirskogo Priirtyshya. Selektsiya s/kh rasteniy na vysokuyu urozhaynost, stabilnost i kachestvo [Study of soybean accessions from the Vavilov Institute global collection in the Siberian Irtysh region. Breeding of crops for high performance, stability, and quality]. Omsk, 2012: 216-221.
18. Penchukov V.M., Zaytsev N.I., Dudka N.Z., Matsola N.A. New soybean varieties for regions with unstable moistening. Agrarnaya nauka = Agrarian science. 2012;3:4-6.
19. Savin V.N., Abugaliev I.A., Abugalieva A.I. Optimization of analytical studies in plant industry. Doklady Rossiyskoy Akademii Selskokhozyaystvennykh Nauk = Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 1998;2:13-15.
Review
Views:
1529
Email this article 