Наследование признака «многоцветковость» у мягкой пшеницы и оценка продуктивности колоса гибридов F2

Оценивали параметры продуктивности колоса у растений сортов Новосибирская 67 (Н67), Саратовская 29 (С29), Puza-4 и «многоцветковой» линии Skle 123-09 в разные по условиям вегетации годы. Установлено, что у многоцветковой линии число зерен колоса и озерненность колоска достоверно выше, чем у сортов Н67, С29 и Puza-4, и проявление многоцветковости зависит как от условий вегетации, так и генотипа. Таким образом, «многоцветковость», или многозерность, – генетически обусловленный признак, с которым можно вести селекционную работу. При изучении популяций гибридов F2 С29×Skle123-09, Н67×Skle123-09, Р-4×Skle123-09 были выделены растения, обладающие веерообразными колосками и высокой озерненностью, как Skle 123-09, и имеющие наи- лучшие показатели других признаков колоса, как сорта-реципиенты. Семена этих растений будут использованы для закрепления признака «многоцветковость». С помощью двухфакторного дисперсионного анализа выявлено, что число завязавшихся зерен на колос зависит от условий выращивания, генотипа и их взаимодействия. Изменчивость признака «озерненность колоска» у засухоустойчивых сортов С29 и Puza-4 в основном зависит от генотипа, в меньшей степени от взаимодействия генотип × среда. У сорта Н67, созданного для условий Западной Сибири, – лишь от генотипа. На массу зерна колоса главным образом влияет взаимодействие генотип×среда (почти на 60 %), а влияние факторов А (генотип) и В (условия среды) оказалось в два раза меньше. На изменчивость признака «масса одной зерновки» у гибридов F2 С29×Skle123-09 и P-4×Skle 123-09 влияние оказывают факторы среды, генотип и их взаимодействие. Вклад генотипа составляет более 70 %, а у гибридов F2 H67×Skle 123-09 доля изменчивости наибольшая при взаимодействии генотип× ×среда и составляет 77 %.

мягкая пшеница, многоцветковость, дисперсионный анализ, изменчивость

1. Abbate P.E., Andrade F.H., Culot J.P. The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1995;124: 351-360.

2. Abbate P.E., Andrade F.H., Culot J.P., Bindraban P.S. Grain yield in wheat: effects of radiation during spike growth period. Field Crops Res. 1997;54:245-257.

3. Aliyeva A.J., Aminov N.K. Inheritance of the branching in hybrid populations among tetraploid wheat species and the new branched spike line 166-Schakheli. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 2011;58:621-628.

4. Arbuzova V.S., Efremova T.T., Martinek P., Chumanova E.V., Dobrovolskaya O.B. Variability of spike productivity in F2 hybrids obtained by crossing common wheat varieties Novosibirskaya 67, Saratovskaya 29, and Puza-4 to the Skle 123-09 multifloret line. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2014;18(4/1):704-712.

5. Arbuzova V.S., Efremova T.T., Martinek P., Chumanova E.V., Dobrovolskaya O.B. Variability of spike productivity in F2 hybrids obtained by crossing common wheat varieties Novosibirskaya 67, Saratovskaya 29, and Puza-4 with the Skle 123-09 multifloret line. Russ. J. Genet.: Appl. Res. 2015;5(3):208-215. DOI 10.1134/S207905971503003X

6. Arbuzova V.S., Maystrenko O.I. The study of a series of monosomic lines of wheat Saratovskaya 29 and Diamant I in different years of vegetation on a number of quantitative traits: Part I. The number of spikelets and grains of the main ear. Genetika = Genetics (Moscow). 1986;XXII(9):2317-2325.

7. Arbuzova V.S., Maystrenko O.I. Study of monosomic lines of spring wheat varieties Saratovskaya 29 and Diamant 1 in different growing conditions for quantitative traits: Part II. The grains mass of the main ear and the mass of one grain. Genetika = Genetics (Moscow). 1987;XXIII(1):111-122.

8. Auzemus E.R., Mac-Neal F.H., Schmidt Yu.U. Genetika i nasledovanie. Pshenitsa i ee uluchshenie [Genetics and Inheritance. Wheat and Its Improvement]. Mosсow, Kolos, 1970.

9. Bindraban P.S., Sayre K.D., Solis-Moya E. Identifying factors that determine kernel number in wheat. Field Crops Res. 1998;58:223-234.

10. Brooking I.R., Kirby E.J.M. Interrelationships between stem and ear development in winter wheat: effects of Norin-10 dwarfing gene, Gai/Rht2. Agric. Sci. 1981;97:373-381.

11. Börner A., Schumann E., Fürste A., Cöster H., Leithold B., Röder M., Weber W. Mapping of quantitative trait loci determining agronomic important characters in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002;105:921-936.

12. Chesnokov Yu.V., Pochepnya N.V., Kozlenko L.V., Sitnikov M.N., Mitrofanova O.P., Syukov V.V., Kochetkov D.V., Lovasser U., Börner A. Mapping of QTLs determining the expression of agronomically and economically valuable features in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in environmentally different Russia regions. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2012;16(4/2):970-985.

13. Chesnokov Y.V., Pochepnya N.V., Kozlenko L.V., Sitnikov M.N., Mitrofanova O.P., Syukov V.V., Kochetkov D.V., Lohwasser U., Börner A. Mapping of QTLs determining the expression of agronomically and economically valuable features in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown in environmentally different Russian regions. Russ. J. Genet.: Appl. Res. 2013;3(3):209-221. DOI 10.1134/S2079059713030039

14. Dobrovol’skaya O.B., Martinek P., Adonina I.G., Badaeva E.D., Orlov Yu.L., Salina E.A., Laikova L.I. Effect of rearrangements of homeologous group 2 chromosomes of bread wheat on spike morphology. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii=Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2014;18(4/1):672-679.

15. Dragavtsev V.A. K probleme geneticheskogo analiza poligennykh kolichestvennykh priznakov rasteniy [On the Problem of Polygenic Genetic Analysis of Quantitative Traits of Plants]. St. Petersburg, Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry, 2003.

16. Dragavtsev V.A., Zielke R.A., Reuters B.G. Genetika priznakov produktivnosti yarovykh pshenits v Zapadnoy Sibiri [Genetics of Productivity Traits of Spring Wheat in West Siberia]. Novosibirsk, 1984.

17. Filipchenko Y.A. Genetika myagkikh pshenits [Genetics of Common Wheat]. Moscow, Leningrad, Selkhozgiz, 1934.

18. Fischer R.A. Yield potential of dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Sci. 1975;15:607-613.

19. Fischer R.A. Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. Agric. Sci. 1985;105:447-461.

20. Fischer R.A., Aguilar I., Laing D.R. Posta thesis sink size in high yielding dwarf wheat: yield response to grain number. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1977;28:165-175.

21. Fischer R.A., Stokman Y.M. Increased kernel number in Norin-10 derived dwarf wheat: evaluation of the cause. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1986;13:767-784.

22. Ganal M.V., Röder M.S. Microsatellite and SNP markers in wheat breeding. Genomics Assisted Crop Improvement: Genomics Applications in Crops. Eds R.K. Varshney, R. Tuberosa. Springer, 2007;2:1-24.

23. Gonzalez F.G., Slafer G.A., Miralles D.J. Photoperiod during stem elongation in wheat: is its impact on fertile floret number and grain number determination similar to that of radiation? Funct. Plant Biol. 2005;32:181-188.

24. Hucl P., Fowler J. Comparison of a branched spike wheat with the cultivars Neepawa and HY320 for grain yield and yield components. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1992;2:671-677.

25. Kilchevsky A.V., Khotyleva L.V. Ekologicheskaya selektsiya rasteniy [Ecological Plant Breeding]. Minsk, Tekhnologiya. 1997.

26. Kumakov V.A. Fiziologiya yarovoy pshenitsy [Physiology of Spring Wheat]. Moscow, Kolos, 1980.

27. Kuperman F.M. Biologicheskie osnovy kultury pshenitsy. Biologicheskie osobennosti formirovaniya organov plodonosheniya pshenitsy [Biological Basis of Wheat Cultivation. Biological Features of the Formation of Fruiting Bodies of Wheat]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1953.

28. Kuperman F.M. Biologiya razvitiya kulturnykh rasteniy [Developmental Biology of Cultivated Plants]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1982.

29. Lelley J. Selektsiya pshenitsy. Teoriya i praktika [Wheat Breeding. Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Kolos, 1980.

30. Li W.P., Zhao W.M. A breeding method for increasing spikelet and studies on creation of new germplasm resource in wheat. Acta Agron. Sin. 2000;26:222-230.

31. Lutova L.A., Yezhova T.E., Dodueva I.E., Osipova M.A. Genetika razvitiya rasteniy. Pod red. S.G. Inge-Vechtomova [Genetics of Plant Development. Ed. S.G. Inge-Vechtomov]. St. Petersburg, N.-L. Publ., 2010.

32. Marino C.L., Nelson J.C., Lu Y.H., Nelson J.C, Sorrells M.E., Lu Y.H., Leroy P., Lopes C.R. Molecular genetics maps of the group 6 chromosomes of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.). Genome. 1996;39:359-366.

33. Martinek P. Branchiness of the turgidum type spikes, its heredity and utilization in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genet. Slecht. 1994;30:61-67.

34. Martinek P., Bednar J. Gene resources with non-standard spike morphology in wheat. Ed. A. Slinkard. Proc. Int. 9th Wheat Genet. Symp., Saskatoon, Canada. 2–7 Aug. 1988. Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. 1988.

35. Martinek P., Bednar J. Changes of spike morphology (multirowspikeMRS, long glumes-LG) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their importance for breeding. Proc. of the Intern. Conf. «Genetic collections, isogenic and alloplasmic lines». Novosibirsk, Russia, 2001.

36. Morris R. Chromosomal locations of gene for wheat characters. Ann. Wheat Newsletter, Kansas, 1962–1972. IX-XIX.

37. Ostreiko S.A. A new form of wheat. Vestnik Selskokhozyaystvennoy Nauki = Herald of Agricultural Sciences. 1959;11:133-137.

38. Pshenitsy mira. Pod red. V.F. Dorofeeva [World Wheats. Ed. V.F. Dorofeev]. Leningrad, Agropromizdat, 1987.

39. Rokitsky P.F. Vvedenie v statisticheskuyu genetiku [Introduction to Statistical Genetics], Minsk, Vysheyshaya shkola, 1974.

40. Röder M.S., Korzun V., Wendehake K. Plaschke J., Tixier M-H., Leroy P., Ganal M.W. A microsatellite map of wheat. 1998;149:2007-2023.

41. Rigin B.V. Genetic control of some characters in wheat. Tsitogenetika pshenitsy i ee gibridov. Pod red. P.M. Zhukovskogo, V.V. Khvostovoy [Cytogenetics of Wheat and Its Hybrids. Eds P.M. Zhukovsky, V.V. Khvostova]. Moscow, Nauka, 1971.

42. Sears E.R. The aneuploids of common wheat. Res. Bull. Mis. Agric. Exptl. Sta. 1954;572:1-58.

43. Slafer G.A., Abeledo L.D. Miralles D.L.J., Gonzalez F.G., Whitechurch E.M. Photoperiod sensitivity during stem elongation as an avenue to raise potential yield in wheat. Euphytica. 2001;119:191-197.

44. Sreenivasulu N., Schnurbusch T. A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(2):91-100.

45. Syukov V.V., Madyakin E.V., Kochetkov D.V. The contribution of genotype-environmental effects to the formation of quantitative traits in inbred and outbred plants. Informatsionnyy vestnik VOGiS = The Herald of Vavilov Society for Geneticists and Breeders. 2010;14(1):141-147.

46. Syukov V.V., Madyakin E.V., Kochetkov D.V. The contribution of genotype – environmental effects to the formation of quantitative traits of inbred and outbred plants. Russ. J. Genet.: Appl. Res. 2011;1(1):3337. DOI 10.1134/S2079059711010102

47. Toyota M., Tsutsui I., Kusutani A., Asanuma K.I. Initiation and development of florets in wheat as influenced by shading and nitrogen supply at the spikelet stage. Plant Prod. Sci. 2001;4:283-290.

48. Vavilov N.I. Nauchnye osnovy selektsii pshenitsy [Scientific Bases of Wheat Breeding]. Moscow-Leningrad, 1935.

49. Youseffian S., Kirby E.J.M., Gale M.D. Pleiotropic effects of the GAinsensitive Rht dwarfing genes in wheat. 2. Effects on leaf, stem, ear and floret growth. Field Crops Res. 1992;28:191-210.

50. Zielke R.A. Genetika, tsitogenetika i selektsiya rasteniy. Sobranie nauchnykh trudov. Red. S.G. Ikryannikov [Genetics, Cytogenetics and Plant Breeding. Collection of Scientific Works. Ed. S.G. Ikryannikov]. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, 2003.

51. Zielke R.A., Ryzhova I.A. Monosomic analysis of quantitative traits of common spring wheat with a new series of aneuploids Milturum 553. Doklady VASKhNIL = Reports of the Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 1985;7:11-13.