Preview

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Advanced search

The influence of prenatal environmental conditions on the weight of newborn domestic pigs

https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ17.273

Abstract

The weight of newborn piglets in domestic pigs depends on the maternal environment. Using an original algorithm based on the comparison of the coefficients of correlation between the half-nests (the same average genotype and the same conditions of the embryonic environment) and the twin sockets (the same genotype, different conditions of the embryonic environment), it was possible to estimate the relative contribution of the various components to the weight of the newborn in the domestic pigs. Our investigation found that the relative contribution of environmental conditions during prenatal development into newborn weight variation is equal to 0.4717, the contribution of genotypic component is 0.4032; the contribution of interaction between environmental conditions and ambivalence of the “genotype–phenotype” relationships is 0.0846, indeterminacy of phenotypic realization of the littermate’s genotypes is 0.0405. Maternal resource plays the main role amongst factors forming the environmental conditions of prenatal development. The gene pool will remain unchanged in any number of generations, despite a change in the population parameters of the trait. In principle, it can be assumed that when a population reaches a certain level, when the mean value of the trait and the gene pool are optimal (the selection pressure vectors are mutually balanced), selection becomes less effective in transforming the average phenotype than changing environmental conditions. Obviously, therefore, livestock maintenance and feeding are paid as much attention as breeding, and breeds of farmed animals are zoned.

About the Authors

S. V. Nikitin
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk


S. P. Knyazev
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk


V. I. Ermolayev
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk


References

1. Andersen I.L., Nævdal E., Bøe K.E. Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2011;65(6):1159-167.

2. Bekenev V.A., Dement’yev V.N., Ermolaev V.I., Goncharenko G.M., Deeva V.S., Nikitin S.V., Knyazev S.P., Savina M.A., Orlova G.V., Aitnazarov R.B., Yudin N.S., Zabolotnaya A.A., Frolova V.I. Geneticheskie metody v selektsii sviney [Genetics Methods in Pig Breeding]. Novosibirsk: SibNIIZh Publ., 2012. (in Russian)

3. Bidanel J.-P., Milan D., Iannuccelli N., Amigues Y., Boscher M.-Y., Bourgeois F., Caritez J.-C., Gruand J., Le Roy P., Lagant H., Quintanilla R., Renard C., Gellin J., Ollivier L., Chevalet C. Detection of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2001;33:289-309.

4. Iogansson I., Rendel’ Ya., Gravert O. Genetika i razvedenie domashnikh zhivotnykh [Genetics and Breeding of Livestock]. Moscow: Kolos Publ., 1970. (in Russian)

5. Kabanov V.D. Povyshenie produktivnosti sviney [Improvement of Pig Productivity]. Moscow: Kolos Publ., 1983. (in Russian)

6. Knott S.A., Marklund L., Haley C.S., Andersson K., Davies W., Ellegren H., Fredholm M., Hansson I., Hoyheim B., Lundstrom K., Moller M., Andersson L. Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and Large White pigs. Genetics. 1998;149(2):1069-1080.

7. Knyazev S.P., Nikitin. S.V. Standardizing selection and its consequences for genetic population structure. Rus. J. Genetics. 2011;47(1):90-99.

8. Knyazev S.P., Nikitin S.V. Changing selection vectors in breeding for piglet birth weight in the formation of a population in a novel environment. Selskokhozyaystvennaya Biologiya = Agricultural Biology. 2014;6:86-95. (in Russian)

9. Knyazev S.P., Nikitin S.V., Ermolaev V.I. Genetics of large birth weight in pigs: sexual dimorphism and genetic control of birth weight. Vestnik Novosibirskogo Gosudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta = Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Agrarian University. 2013;1:46- 57. (in Russian)

10. Knyazev S.P., Nikitin S.V., Ermolaev V.I. The role of biological limitations of the maximum weight of a newborn piglet in variations of the trait. Sbornik trudov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii “Aktualnye problemy agropromyshlennogo kompleksa. Тom Selskokhozyaystvennye nauki. Biologicheskie nauki. Veterinarnye nauki” [Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference “Current Issues in Agroindustry”. Volume “Agricultural sciences, biological sciences, and veterinary sciences”]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Agrarian University Publ., 2016;175-179. (in Russian)

11. Lakin G.F. Biometriya [Biometrics]. Moscow: Vysshaya Schkola Publ., 1990. (in Russian)

12. Nazarova G.G., Proskurnjak L.P., Knyazev S.P., Nikitin S.V. Genetic components of birth weight in two multiparous species of mammals. Nauchnoe obozrenie = Science Review. 2015;20:26-36. (in Russian)

13. NCBI Map Viewer. 2011. www.nbci.nlm.nih.gov/projects/mapview/.

14. Nikitin S.V., Knyazev S.P. Otbor i adaptatsiya v populyatsiyakh domashnikh sviney [Selection and Adaptation in Domestic Pig Populations]. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Publ., 2015. (in Russian)

15. Nikitin S.V., Knyazev S.P., Ermolaev V.I. Animal populations: model and reality. Nauchnoe obozrenie = Science Review. 2014;9(2):335- 342. (in Russian)

16. Nikitin S.V., Knyazev S.P., Ermolaev V.I. Genetic components and the uncertainty of the phenotypic realization of the mass of newborns in domestic pigs Sus scrofa. Rus. J. Genetics. 2014a;50(1):61-70.

17. Nikitin S.V., Knyazev S.P., Yermolaev V.I. Weight variations in newborn domestic pigs and the adaptation process. Rus. J. Genetics: Appl. Res. 2014b;4(6):498-510.

18. Nikoro Z.S., Stakan G.A., Kharitonova Z.N., Vasil’yeva L.A., Ginzburg E.H., Reshetnikova N.F. Teoreticheskie osnovy selektsii zhivotnykh [Theoretical Bases of Animal Breeding]. Moscow: Kolos Publ., 1968. (in Russian)

19. Plokhinskiy N.A. Rukovodstvo po biometrii dlya zootekhnikov [Guide to Biometrics for Livestock Experts]. Moscow: Kolos Publ., 1969. (in Russian)

20. Rothschild M.F., Hu J.-L., Jiang Z. Advances in QTL mapping in pigs. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2007;3(3):192-197.

21. Wada Y., Akita T., Awata T., Furukawa T., Sugai N., Inage Y., Ishii K., Ito Y., Kobayashi E., Kusumoto H., Matsumoto T., Mikawa S., Miyake M., Murase A., Shimanuki S., Sugiyama T., Uchida Y., Yanai S., Yasue H. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis in a Meishan × Gottingen cross population. Anim. Genetics. 2000;31:376- 384.

22. Wang X., Liu X., Deng D., Yu M., Li X. Genetic determinants of pig birth weight variability. BMC Genet. 2016;17(1):15. DOI 10.1186/ s12863-015-0309-6.


Review

Views: 520


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)