Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции

Расширенный поиск


Полный текст:


Рассмотрены современные представления об эмбриональных стволовых клетках мыши и человека. Обсуждаются предпосылки и методы их получения, стратегия доказательства плюрипотентности, проблемы при долговременном культивировании in vitro. Освещены некоторые проблемы биологии эмбриональных стволовых клеток и перспективы использования для клеточной терапии.

Об авторе

А. Г. Мензоров
Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт цитологии и генетики Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук, Новосибирск, Россия; Новосибирский национальный исследовательский государственный университет, Новосибирск, Россия

Список литературы

1. Медведев С.П., Шевченко А.И., Сухих Г.Т., Закиян С.М. Индуцированные плюрипотентные стволовые клетки. Новосибирск: Изд-во СО РАН, 2011. 216 с.

2. Bock C., Kiskinis E., Verstappen G. et al. Reference maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines // Cell. 2011. V. 144. No. 3. P. 439–452.

3. Bradley A., Evans M., Kaufman M.H., Robertson E. Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines // Nature. 1984. V. 309(5965). P. 255–256.

4. Bryja V., Bonilla S., Cajanek L. et al. An effi cient method for the derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells // Stem Cells. 2006. V. 24. No. 4. P. 844–849.

5. Buehr M., Meek S., Blair K. et al. Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts // Cell. 2008. V. 135. No. 7. P. 1287–1298.

6. Chambers I., Colby D., Robertson M. et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells // Cell. 2003. V. 113. No. 5. P. 643–655.

7. Dean W., Bowden L., Aitchison A. et al. Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes // Development. 1998. V. 125. No. 12. P. 2273–2282.

8. Evans M.J. The isolation and properties of a clonal tissue culture strain of pluripotent mouse teratocarcinoma cells // J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1972. V. 28. P. 163–196.

9. Evans M. Discovering pluripotency: 30 years of mouse embryonic stem cells // Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011. V. 12. No. 10. P. 680–686.

10. Evans M.J., Kaufman M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos // Nature. 1981. V. 292. P. 154–156.

11. Friel R., van der Sar S., Mee P.J. Embryonic stem cells: understanding their history, cell biology and signaling // Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005. V. 57. No. 13. P. 1894–1903.

12. Guo J., Jauch A., Heidi H.G. et al. Multicolor karyotype analyses of mouse embryonic stem cells // In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2005. V. 41. No. 8/9. P. 278–283.

13. Hanna J., Cheng A.W., Saha K. et al. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010a. V. 107. P. 9222–9227.

14. Hanna J.H., Saha K., Jaenisch R. Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues // Cell. 2010b. V. 143. No. 4. P. 508–525.

15. Hayashi K., Ohta H., Kurimoto K. et al. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specifi cation pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells // Cell. 2011. V. 146. No. 4. P. 519–532.

16. Hayashi K., Ogushi S., Kurimoto K. et al. Offspring from oocytes derived from in vitro primordial germ cell-like cells in mice // Science. 2012. [DOI:10.1126/science.1226889].

17. Holubcová Z., Matula P., Sedlačkova M. et al. Human embryonic stem cells suffer from centrosomal amplifi cation // Stem Cells. 2011. V. 29. No. 1. P. 46–56.

18. Laurent L.C., Ulitsky I., Slavin I. et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture // Cell. Stem. Cell. 2011. V. 8. No. 1. P. 106–118.

19. Li P., Tong C., Mehrian-Shai R. et al. Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts // Cell. 2008. V. 135. No. 7. P. 1299–1310.

20. Liang Q., Conte N., Skarnes W.C., Bradley A. Extensive genomic copy number variation in embryonic stem cells // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008. V. 105. No. 45. P. 17453–17456.

21. Liu X., Wu H., Loring J. et al. Trisomy eight in ES cells is a common potential problem in gene targeting and interferes with germ line transmission // Dev. Dyn. 1997. V. 209. No. 1. P. 85–91.

22. Macfarlan T.S., Gifford W.D., Driscoll S. et al. Embryonic stem cell potency fl uctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity // Nature. 2012. V. 487. No. 7405. P. 57–63.

23. Mantel C., Guo Y., Lee M.R. et al. Checkpoint-apoptosis uncoupling in human and mouse embryonic stem cells: a source of karyotуpic instability // Blood. 2007. V. 109. No. 10. P. 4518–4527.

24. Martin G.R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1981. V. 78. P. 7634–7638.

25. Martin G.R., Evans M.J. Differentiation of clonal lines of teratocarcinoma cells: formation of embryoid bodies in vitro // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1975. V. 72. P. 1441–1445.

26. Mintz B., Illmensee K. Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1975. V. 72. P. 3585–3589.

27. Nagy A., Gocza E., Diaz E.M. et al. Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse // Development. 1990. V. 110. No. 3. P. 815–821.

28. Nagy A., Rossant J., Nagy R. et al. Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1993. V. 90. No. 18. P. 8424–8428.

29. Nichols J., Evans E.P., Smith A.G. Establishment of germ-linecompetent embryonic stem (ES) cells using differentiation inhibiting activity // Development. 1990. V. 110. No. 4. P. 1341–1348.

30. Nishikawa S., Jakt L.M., Era T. Embryonic stem-cell culture as a tool for developmental cell biology // Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007. V. 8. No. 6. P. 502–507.

31. Papaioannou V.E., McBurney M.W., Gardner R.L., Evans M.J. Fate of teratocarcinoma cells injected into early mouse embryos // Nature. 1975. V. 258. P. 70–73.

32. Rugg-Gunn P.J., Ferguson-Smith A.C., Pedersen R.A. Status of genomic imprinting in human embryonic stem cells as revealed by a large cohort of independently derived and maintained lines // Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007. V. 16. No. 2. P. 243–251.

33. Solter D., Knowles B.B. Monoclonal antibody defi ning a stagespecific mouse embryonic antigen (SSEA-1) // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1978. V. 75. P. 5565–5569.

34. Stevens L.C., Little C.C. Spontaneous testicular teratomas in an inbred strain of mice // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1954. V. 40. P. 1080–1087.

35. Sugawara A., Goto K., Sotomaru Y. et al. Current status of chromosomal abnormalities in mouse embryonic stem cell lines used in Japan // Comp. Med. 2006. V. 56. No. 1. P. 31–34.

36. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fi broblast cultures by defi ned factors // Cell. 2006. V. 126. No. 4. P. 663–676.

37. Tam P.P., Rossant J. Mouse embryonic chimeras: tools for studying mammalian development // Development. 2003. V. 130. No. 25. P. 6155–6163.

38. Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts // Science. 1998. V. 282. No. 5391. P. 1145–1147.

39. Thomson J.A., Kalishman J., Golos T.G. et al. Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995. V. 92. No. 17. P. 7844–7848.

40. Vierbuchen T., Ostermeier A., Pang Z.P. et al. Direct conversion of fi broblasts to functional neurons by defi ned factors // Nature. 2010. V. 463 No. 7284. P. 1035–1041.

41. Watanabe K., Ueno M., Kamiya D. et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells // Nat. Biotechnol. 2007. V. 25. No. 6. P. 681–686.

42. Wobus A.M., Boheler K.R. Embryonic stem cells: prospects for developmental biology and cell therapy // Physiol. Rev. 2005. V. 85. No. 2. P. 635–678.

43. Ying Q.L., Nichols J., Chambers I., Smith A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3 // Cell. 2003. V. 115. No. 3. P. 281–292.

Просмотров: 245

Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2500-0462 (Print)
ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)