Preview

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Advanced search

Genome polymorphism of the synthetic species xTrititrigia cziczinii Tsvel. inferred from AFLP analysis

https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ18.406

Abstract

×Trititrigia cziczinii Tsvel. is a synthetic species obtained as a result of hybridization of different wheat and wheat- grass species. ×T. cziczinii has unique characteristics, as it is a perennial species, with the ability to grow after mowing, high adaptability, resistance to diseases and pests, high protein and gluten content in the grain. All this makes it a promising new crop for agriculture. The new species is a good object for fundamental research in the field of genetics, phylogeny and evolution of cereals (Poaceae). However, there were practically no genetic studies of ×T. cziczinii. The aim of this work was to study the genetic diversity of 24 representatives of two ×T. cziczinii subspecies (ssp. Submitans and ssp. Perenne). To estimate interspecific differences, 17 samples of other tribe Triticeae species (Triticum aestivum, Triticum durum, Agropyron glaucum and Agropyron elon gatum, as well as samples of Triticum-Agropyron and TriticumElymus hybrids) were included in the analysis. For the study, AFLP method (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) was chosen, which allowed us to reveal a sufficiently high polymorphism level of the studied samples. The two primer/enzyme combinations (EcoRI-ACT/MseI-CCC, EcoRI-ACT/MseI-CTA) allow ed the iden tification of 227 fragments, 224 of them were polymorphic (98.68 %), and the level of intraspecific polymorphism of 24 ×T. cziczinii samples was 68.15 %. The iden tified fragments of AFLP spectra, specific for the ×T. cziczinii representatives and the studied wheatgrass species, can be the basis for creating markers that will detect introgressions of genetic material of the genus Agropyron in the T. cziczinii ge nome. Our results indicate a greater genetic relatedness of ×T. cziczinii to T. aestivum than to representatives of the genus Agropyron. According to the cluster analysis, representatives of ×T. cziczinii and varieties of bread wheat were combined into a single subcluster, within which the samples of two species form separate groups. At the same time, the evaluation of the intraspecific genetic diversity of ×T. cziczinii showed  no reliable differentiation of representatives of the subspecies Submitans and Perenne, which is probably due to uncertain genetic nature of perenniality, the main feature that divides these subspecies. The study of the unique ×T. cziczinii collection allowed us to obtain the first data on the genetics of the species, while previous studies were focused mainly on phenotypic and economically valuable traits. AFLP analysis used in this study showed high efficiency when working with less studied species, and its results are promising and useful for understanding the genetic structure of the new species (×T. cziczinii Tsvel.). 

About the Authors

A. A. Trifonova
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


K. V. Boris
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


L. V. Dedova
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


V. A. Melnik
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


L. P. Ivanova
N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


N. P. Kuzmina
N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


S. V. Zavgorodniy
N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


V. P. Upelniek
N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, RAS.
Russian Federation
Moscow.


References

1. Altinkut A., Kazan K., Gozukirmizi N. AFLP marker linked to waterstress­tolerant bulks in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genet. Mol. Biol. 2003;26(1):77­82. DOI 10.1590/S1415­47572003000100013.

2. Benbouza H., Jacquemin J., Baudoin J., Mergeai G. Optimization of a reliable, fast, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect SSR markers in polyacrylamide gels. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2006;10(2):77­81.

3. Colomba M.S., Gregorini A. Genetic diversity analysis of the durum wheat Graziella Ra, Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (Desf.) Husn. (Poales, Poaceae). Biodivers. J. 2011;2:73­84.

4. Doyle J. DNA protocols for plants. Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy NATO ASI Series. 1991;57:283­293.

5. Duarte J.M., Santos J.B.D., Melo L.C. Comparison of similarity coefficients based on RAPD markers in the common bean. Genet. Mol. Biol. 1999;22(3):427­432. DOI 10.1590/S1415­47571999000300024.

6. El Rabey H.A., Al­Malki A.L., Abulnaja K.O., Ebrahim M.K., Kumosani T., Khan J.A. Phylogeny of ten species of the genus Hordeum L. as revealed by AFLP markers and seed storage protein electrophoresis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014;41(1):365­372. DOI 10.1007/s11033­0132870­2.

7. Goryunova S.V., Chikida N.N., Kochieva E.Z. AFLP, RAPD, and ISSR analysis of intraspecific polymorphism and interspecific differences of allotetraploid species Aegilops kotschyi Boiss. and Aegilops variabilis Eig. Russ. J. Genetics (Moscow). 2017;53(5):568­575. DOI 10.1134/S1022795417050040.

8. Hammer O., Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):1­9.

9. Jensen K.B., Yan X., Larson S.R., Wang R.R.C., Robins J.G. Agronomic and genetic diversity in intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium). Plant Breed. 2016;135(6):751­758. DOI 10.1111/ pbr.12420.

10. Kaya H.B., Demirci M., Tanyolac B. Genetic structure and diversity analysis revealed by AFLP on different Echinochloa spp. from northwest Turkey. Plant Syst. Evol. 2014;300(6):1337­1347. DOI 10.1007/s00606­013­0965­9.

11. Khalighi M., Arzani A., Poursiahbidi M.A. Assessment of genetic diversity in Triticum spp. and Aegilops spp. using AFLP markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008;7(5):546­552.

12. Khan M.K., Pandey A., Choudhary S., Hakki E.E., Akkaya M.S., Thomas G. From RFLP to DArT: molecular tools for wheat (Triticum spp.) diversity analysis. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2014;61(5):10011032. DOI 10.1007/s10722­014­0114­5.

13. Krupin P.Yu., Diva shuk M.G., Fesenko I.A., Karlov G.I. Adaptation of wheat microsatellite SSR­markers for the genome analysis of intermediate wheatgrass, tall wheatgrass, and wheat­wheatgrass hybrids. Izves tiya Timiryazevskoy Selskokhozyaystvennoy Akademii = Proceedings of the Timiryazev Agricultural Academy. 2011;3:49­57. (in Russian)

14. Lage J., Warburton M.L., Crossa J., Skovmand B., Andersen S.B. Assessment of genetic diversity in synthetic hexaploid wheats and their Triticum dicoccum and Aegilops tauschii parents using AFLPs and agronomic traits. Euphytica. 2003;134(3):305­317.

15. Lyubimova V.F., Myasnikova A.P., Belov V.I. Cytogenetic study of the perennial wheat forms. Genetics and Breeding of Distant Hybrids. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1976. (in Russian)

16. Sadigov G.B., Trifonova A.A., Kud ryavtsev A.M. Genetic diversity in collection of cultivars and varieties of Triticum durum Desf. from Azerbaijan. Russ. J. Gene tics. (Moscow). 2017;53(5):576­586. DOI 10.1134/S1022795417050088.

17. Tsitsin N.V. New species and new varieties of wheat. Byulleten’ Glavnogo Botanicheskogo Sada = Bulletin of the Central Botanical Garden. 1960;38:38­41. (in Russian)

18. Tsvelev N.N. Conspectus specierum tribus Triticeae Dum. familiae Poaceae in flora USSR. Novosti Systematiki Vysshykh Rasteniy = News in Higher Plant Taxonomy. 1973;10:19­59. (in Russian)

19. Upelniek V.P., Belov V.I., Ivanova L.P., Dolgova S.P., Demidov A.S. Heritage of academician N.V. Tsitsin: state­of­the­art and potential of the collection of intermediate wheat × couch­grass hybrids. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2012;16(3): 667­674. (in Russian)

20. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23(21):4407­4414.

21. Xue Y., Chu L. A rapid identification of barley varieties using DNAAFLP. J. Institute of Brewing. 2015;121(4):496­501. DOI 10.1002/jib.253.


Review

Views: 1005


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)