Preview

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Advanced search

Generation of microdissected DNA probes from metaphase chromosomes when chromosome identification by routine staining is impossible

https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ20.46-o

Abstract

Application of microdissected DNA libraries and DNA probes in numerous and various modern molecular cytogenetic studies showed them as an efficient and reliable tool in the analysis of chromosome reorganization during karyotypic evolution and in the diagnosis of human chromosome pathology. An important advantage of DNA probe generation by metaphase chromosome microdissection followed by sequence-independent polymerase chain reaction in comparison with the method of DNA probe generation using chromosome sorting is the possibility of DNA probe preparation from chromosomes of an individual sample without cell line establishment for the production of a large number of metaphase chromosomes. One of the main requirements for successful application of this technique is a possibility for identification of the chromosome of interest during its dissection and collection of its material from metaphase plates spread on the coverslip. In the present study, we developed and applied a technique for generation of microdissected DNA probes in the case when chromosome identification during microdissection appeared to be impossible. The technique was used for generation of two sets of Whole Chromosome Paints (WCPs) from all chromosomes of two species of free-living flatworms in the genus Macrostomum, M. mirumnovem and M. cliftonensis. The single-copy chromosome technique including separate collection of all chromosomes from one metaphase plate allowed us to generate WCPs that painted specifically the original chromosome by Chromosome In Situ Suppression Hybridization (CISS-Hybridization). CISS-Hybridization allowed identifying the original chromosome(s) used for DNA probe generation. Pooled WCPs derived from homologous chromosomes increased the intensity and specificity of chromosome painting provided by CISS-Hybridization. In the result, the obtained DNA probes appeared to be good enough for application in our studies devoted to analysis of karyotypic evolution in the genus Macrostomum and for analysis of chromosome rearrangements among the worms of laboratory cultures of M. mirumnovem.

About the Authors

K. S. Zadesenets
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk


N. B. Rubtsov
Institute of Cytology and Genetics of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk


References

1. Ferguson-Smith M.A., Trifonov V. Mammalian karyotype evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007;8(12):950-962. DOI 10.1038/nrg2199.

2. Graphodatsky A.S., Yang F., O’Brien P.C.M., Serdukova N., Milne B.S., Trifonov V., Ferguson-Smith M.A. A comparative chromosome map of the Arctic fox, Red fox and dog defined by chromosome painting and high resolution G-banding. Chromosome Res. 2000;8(3):253-263. DOI 10.1023/A:1009217400140.

3. Nesterova T., Rubtsov N., Zakian S., Matveeva V., GraphodatskyA. Mapping of the silver fox genes: assignments of the genes for ME1, ADK, PP, PEPA, GSR, MPI, and GOT1. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1991;56(2):125-127. DOI 10.1159/000133065.

4. Rubtsov N., Graphodatsky A., Matveeva V., Radjabli S., Nesterova T., Kulbakina N., Zakian S. Silver fox gene mapping: conserved chromosome regions in the order Carnivora. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1988;48(2):95-98. DOI 10.1159/000132598.

5. Rubtsov N., Radjabli S., Gradov A., Serov O. Chinese hamster× American mink somatic cell hybrids: characterization of clone panel and assignment of the genes for malate dehydrogenaseNADP-1 and malate dehydrogenase-NAD-1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1981;60:99. DOI 10.1007/BF00282425.

6. Schärer L., Brand J.N., Singh P., Zadesenets K.S., Stelzer C.‐P., Viktorin G.A phylogenetically informed search for an alternative Macrostomum model species, with notes on taxonomy, mating behavior, karyology, and genome size. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2020;58:41-65. DOI 10.1111/jzs.12344.

7. Zadesenets K.S., Ershov N.I., Berezikov E., Rubtsov N.B. Chromosome evolution in the free-living flatworms: first evidence of intrachromosomal rearrangements in karyotype evolution of Macrostomum lignano (Platyhelminthes, Macrostomida). Genes. 2017a;8:298. DOI 10.3390/genes8110298.

8. Zadesenets K., Jetybayev I., Schärer L., Rubtsov N. Genome and karyotype reorganization after whole genome duplication in free-living flatworms of the genus Macrostomum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21:680. DOI 10.3390/ijms21020680.

9. Zadesenets K.S., Schӓrer L., Rubtsov N.B. New insights into the karyotype evolution of the free-living flatworm Macrostomum lignano (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria). Sci. Rep. 2017b;7:6066. DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-06498-0.

10. Zadesenets K.S., Vizoso D.B., Schlatter A., Konopatskaia I.D., Berezikov E., Schärer L., Rubtsov N.B. Evidence for karyotype polymorphism in the free-living flatworm, Macrostomum lignano, a model organism for evolutionary and developmental biology. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164915. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0164915.


Review

Views: 709


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)