Preview

Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Advanced search

An increased proportion of transgenic plants in the progeny of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) transformants

https://doi.org/10.18699/VJ21.018

Abstract

Cotyledon and leaf explants of two spring rapeseed varieties were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring a genetic construct with the gfp marker gene. In order to reduce the proportion of hyperhydrated shoots, which appeared during regenerant formation, we optimized sucrose content in the regeneration media. Analysis of the progeny obtained from T0 regenerants showed that in a number of lines the distribution of the gfp marker did not follow Mendelian segregation of a monogenic trait in self-pollinated plants, while in the progeny of the other lines of transgenic plants, the gfp marker was completely absent, although its presence had been confirmed in all selected T0 plants. We also found that in individual transformants gfp is randomly inherited throughout the central peduncle; its presence in the genome of seedlings does not depend on the location of the pod. Thus, both transformed and non-transformed cells were involved in the formation of gametes in T0 plants. In addition, marker segregation was different in plants of the T1 line obtained by nodal cuttings of a primary transformant, depending on the location of the cuttings on the stem of the original plant, indicating that the nature of T1 generation plants was also chimeric. Furthermore, we showed that propagation of plants by cutting followed by propagation by seeds formed as a result of self-pollination led to an increase in the proportion of transgenic plants in subsequent generations. The results obtained during the course of this study show that the transformants were chimeric, i. e. their tissues contained both transgenic and non-transgenic cells, and this chimeric nature was passed on to subsequent generations. We found that, in addition to nutrient media composition, other factors such as plant genotype and explant type also contribute to the rising of chimeric plants during transformation. Based on these results, we developed a simplified method, which consists of several rounds of a combination of cutting, seed production by self-pollination, and subsequent culling of wild-type plants, which significantly enriched descendent populations of the original rapeseed transformants with plants transgenic for the gfp marker.

About the Authors

G. N. Raldugina
Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Moscow



T. Z. Hoang
Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; NKLPCB, Agricultural Genetics Institute
Russian Federation

Moscow;

Hanoi



H. B. Ngoc
Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Moscow



I. V. Karpichev
Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Aragão F.J.L., Barros L.M.G., Brasileiro A.C.M., Ribeiro S.G., Smith F.D., Sanford J.C., Faria J.C., Rech E.L. Inheritance of foreign genes in transgenic bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) co-transformed via particle bombardment. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996;93:142-150. DOI 10.1007/BF00225739.

2. Byeon B., Kovalchuk I. Non-coding RNAs match the deleted genomic regions in humans. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:37452. DOI 10.1038/srep37452.

3. Chen G.Q. Effective reduction of chimeric tissue in transgenics for the stable genetic transformation of Lesquerella fendleri. HortScience. 2011;46:86-90. DOI 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.1.86.

4. Comai L., Cartwright R.A. A toxic mutator and selection alternative to the non-Mendelian RNA cache hypothesis for hothead reversion. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2856-2858. DOI 10.1105/tpc.105.036293.

5. Costa M.G.C., Otoni W.C., Moore G.A. An evaluation of factors affecting the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Citrus paradisi (Macf.) and production of transgenic plants containing carotenoid biosynthetic genes. Plant Cell Rep. 2002;21:365-373. DOI 10.1007/s00299-002-0533-1.

6. Danilova S.A., Kusnetsov V.V., Dolgikh Yu.I. A novel efficient method for maize genetic transformation: usage of agrobacterial monolayer. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2009;56:258-263. DOI 10.1134/S1021443709020150.

7. Domínguez A., Cervera M., Pérez R.M., Romero J., Fagoaga C., Cubero J., López M.M., Juárez J.A., Navarro L., Peña L. Characterisation of regenerants obtained under selective conditions after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrus explants reveals production of silenced and chimeric plants at unexpected high frequencies. Mol. Breed. 2004;14:171-183. DOI 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000038005.73265.61.

8. Faize M., Faize L., Burgos L. Using quantitative real-time PCR to detect chimeras in transgenic tobacco and apricot and to monitor their dissociation. BMC Biotechnol. 2010;10:53. DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-10-53.

9. Flachowsky H., Riedel M., Reim S., Hanke V. Evaluation of the uniformity and stability of T-DNA integration and gene expression in transgenic apple plants. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2008;11(1):26-40. DOI 10.4067/S0717-34582008000100003.

10. Fulton T.M., Chunwongse J., Tanksley S.D. Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1995;13:207-209. DOI 10.1007/BF02670897.

11. Gomaa A.M., Raldugina G.N., Burmistrova N.A., Radionov N.V., Kuznetsov Vl.V. Response of transgenic rape plants bearing the OsMyb4 gene from rice encoding a trans-factor to low above-zero temperature. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2012;59(1):105-114. DOI 10.1134/S1021443711060070.

12. Green M.R., Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 4th edn. 3 vol. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2013.

13. Hiei Y., Ohta S., Komari T., Kumashiro T. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J. 1994;6:271-282. DOI 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.6020271.x.

14. Hoang T.G., Raldugina G.N. Regeneration of transgenic plants expressing the g fp gene from rape cotyledonary and leaf explants: effects of the genotype and ABA. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2012;59(3): 406-412. DOI 10.1134/S1021443712030089.

15. Irish V.F. Cell lineage in plant development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1991;1:169-173. DOI 10.1016/s0959-437x(05)80065-6.

16. Li B., Xie C., Qiu H. Production of selectable marker-free transgenic tobacco plants using a non-selection approach: chimerism or escape, transgene inheritance, and efficiency. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28:373-386. DOI 10.1007/s00299-008-0640-8.

17. Lindblad K.A., Bracht J.R., Williams A.E., Landweber L.F. Thousands of RNA-cached copies of whole chromosomes are present in the ciliate Oxytricha during development. RNA. 2017;23(8):1200-1208. DOI 10.1261/rna.058511.116.

18. Lolle S.J., Victor J.L., Young J.M., Pruitt R.E. Genome wide non-Mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2005;434:505-509. DOI 10.1038/nature03380.

19. Malyshenko S.I., Tyul’kina L.G., Zvereva S.D., Raldugina G.N. Transgenic Brassica campestris plants expressing the gfp gene. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2003;50(2):276-281. DOI 10.1023/A:1022997803459.

20. Mercier R., Jolivet S., Vignard J., Durand S., Drouaud J., Pelletier G., Nogué F. Outcrossing as an explanation of the apparent unconventional genetic behavior of Arabidopsis thaliana hth mutants. Genetics. 2008;180:2295-2297. DOI 10.1534/genetics.108.095208.

21. Miyagawa Y., Ogawa J., Iwata Y., Koizumi N., Mishiba K.-I. An attempt to detect siRNA-mediated genomic DNA modification by artificially induced mismatch siRNA in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11):e81326. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081326.

22. Popelka J.C., Stephanie G., Moore A., Molvig L., Higgins T.J.V. Genetic transformation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and stable transmission of the transgenes to progeny. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25: 304-312. DOI 10.1007/s00299-005-0053-x.

23. Qin Y., Gao L.H., Pulli S., Guo Y.D. Shoot differentiation, regeneration of cauliflower and analysis of somaclonal variation by RAPD. Hereditas. 2006;143:91-98. DOI 10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01944.x.

24. Rakosy-Tican E., Aurori C.M., Dijkstra C., Thieme R., Aurori A., Davey M.R. The usefulness of the g fp reporter gene for monitoring Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of potato dihaploid and tetraploid genotypes. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:661-671. DOI 10.1007/s00299-006-0273-8.

25. Raldugina G.N., Maree M., Mattana M., Shumkova G., Mapelli S., Kholodova V.P., Karpichev I.V., Kuznetsov Vl.V. Expression of rice OsMyb4 transcription factor improves tolerance to copper or zinc in canola plants. Biol. Plant. 2018;62:511-520. DOI 10.1007/s10535-018-0800-9.

26. Sarmah B.K., Moore A., Tate W., Molvig L., Morton R.L., Rees D.P., Higgins T.J.V. Transgenic chickpea seeds expressing high levels of a bean α-amylase inhibitor. Mol. Breed. 2004;14(1):73-82. DOI 10.1023/b:molb.0000037996.01494.12.

27. Schacherer J. Beyond the simplicity of Mendelian inheritance. C. R. Biologies. 2016;339(7-8):284-288. DOI 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.04.006.

28. Schmülling T., Schell J. Transgenic tobacco plants regenerated from leaf disks can be periclinal chimeras. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993;21:705-708. DOI 10.1007/BF00014554.

29. Sharma K.K., Thorpe T.A. In vitro regeneration of shoot buds and plantlets from seedling root segments of Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 1989;18:129-141. DOI 10.1007/BF00033471.

30. Shimomura O., Johnson F.H., Saiga Y. Extraction, purification and properties of aequorin, a bioluminescent protein from the luminous hydromedusan, Aequorea. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1962;59:223-239. DOI 10.1002/jcp.1030590302.

31. Smiryaev A.V., Kilchevsky A.V. Genetics of Populations and Quantitative Traits. Moscow: KolosS Publ., 2007. (in Russian)

32. Tizaoui K., Kchouk M.E. Genetic approaches for studying transgene inheritance and genetic recombination in three successive generations of transformed tobacco. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012;35:640-649. DOI 10.1590/S1415-47572012000400015.

33. Tooke F., Battey N. Models of shoot apical meristem function. New Phytol. 2003;159:37-52. DOI 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00803.x.

34. Walters D.A., Vetsch C.S., Potts D.E., Lundquist R.C. Transformation and inheritance of a hygromycin phosphotransferase gene in maize plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992;18:189-200. DOI 10.1007/BF00034948.

35. Yu U., Zhao Y.-Q., Zhao B., Ren S., Guo Y.-D. Influencing factors and structural characterization of hyperhydricity of in vitro regeneration in Brassica oleracea var. italica. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2011;91:159-165. DOI 10.1139/CJPS10034.

36. Zhu X.Y., Zhao M., Ma S., Ge Y.M., Zhang M.F., Chen L.P. Induction and origin of adventitious shoots from chimeras of Brassica juncea and Brassica oleracea. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26:1727-1732. DOI 10.1007/s00299-007-0398-4.

37. Zvereva S.D., Romanov G.A. Reporter genes for plant genetic engineering: characteristics and detection. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2000; 47:424-432. Record Number: 20001614176.


Review

Views: 831


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3259 (Online)