Methodological approaches for producing doubled haploids in sugar beet and red beet (Beta vulgaris L.)
Abstract
The in vitro production of doubled haploids is a biotechnological path of an accelerated development of parental lines in F1-hybrid breeding programs. Unlike the traditional inbreeding method requiring 5 to 6 generations to reach a sufficient homozygosity of lines, the number of generations to produce pure lines of beet by haploid technologies is reduced to 2. The production of doubled haploids by gynogenesis is the most common biotechnological approach in sugar and red beets. Protocols for the production of doubled haploids for B. vulgaris species are few and have been developed mainly for sugar beets. There are no protocols for the production of doubled haploids for red beet (B. vulgaris convar. esculenta Salisb.), and the protocols developed for sugar beet (B. vulgaris convar. saccharifera Alef.) are ineffective for red beet, even though these two crops belong to the same species. The greatest success has been achieved in the production of doubled haploids by gynogenesis through isolated ovule culture, especially in sugar beet. Studies on the production of doubled haploids by androgenesis were actively carried out in the 1970s and 1980s and did not lead to the production of regenerated plants. However, at present, there is renewed interest among researchers in this approach, and scientists in different countries are conducting studies of Beta vulgaris androgenesis through isolated microspore culture. This article provides an overview of studies devoted to the production of doubled haploids, addressing the main problems of doubled haploid technologies, and methods to increase the frequency of embryogenesis and doubled haploid plant formation in B. vulgaris crops.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. R. GrigolavaRussian Federation
Moscow
A. V. Vishnyakova
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Sinitsyna
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. V. Voronina
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. N. Zubko
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. V. Zudova
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. G. Monakhos
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Banba H., Tanabe H. A study of anther culture in sugar beet. Bull. Sugar Beet Res. 1972;14:9-16.
2. Baranski R. In vitro gynogenesis in red beet (Beta vulgaris L.): effects of ovule culture conditions. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. Tow. Bot. 1996; 65(1-2):57-60. DOI 10.5586/asbp.1996.010.
3. Bosemark N. Haploids and homozygous diploids, triploids and tetraploids in sugar beet. Hereditas. 1971;69:193-204.
4. Buchter-Larsen A. In situ Induction af Haploide Embryoner pa Sukkerroer efterfulgt af In vitro Embryokultur. Thesis, Acad. Technical Sciences. Copenhagen, 1986.
5. Butterfass Th. Ploidie und Chloroplastenzahlen. Ber. Dtsch. bot. ges. 1959;72:440-451.
6. De La Fuente G.N., Frei U.K., Lübberstedt T. Accelerating plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:667-672. DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.001.
7. Doctrinal M., Sangwan R.S., Sangwan-Norreel B.S. In vitro gynogenesis in Beta vulgaris L.: Effects of plant growth regulators, temperature, genotypes and season. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1989; 17:1-12. DOI 10.1007/BF00042276.
8. D’Halluin K., Keimer B. Production of haploid sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) by ovule culture. In: Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding. Berlin, 1986. DOI 10.1515/9783110871944.
9. Ferrant V., Bouharmont J. Origin of gynogenetic embryos of Beta vulgaris L. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1994;7:12-16. DOI 10.1007/BF00241883.
10. Fischer H.E. Untersuchungen an Zwillingen von Beta vulgaris L. Der Züchter. 1956;26:136-152. DOI 10.1007/BF00710616.
11. Gontarenko S.M., Gerasimenko G.M. Direct induced androgenesis in culture in vitro in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 2018;14(4):375-381. DOI 10.21498/2518-1017.14.4.2018.151900. (in Ukrainian)
12. Gorecka K., Kryzanowska D., Kowalska U., Kiszczak W., Podwyszynska M. Development of embryoids by microspore and anther cultures of red beet (Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris). J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2017;18(1):185-195. DOI 10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1877.
13. Goska M. Monografie i Rozprawy Naukowe. Haploidy i Podwojone Haploidy Buraka Cukrowego (Beta vulgaris L.) oraz Możliwości Ich Wykorzystania w Hodowli. Radzików: Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, 1997.
14. Goska M., Rogozinska J.H. Recent results on obtaining beet haploids through in vitro culture of anthers. Biuletyn Inst. Hodowli I Aklimatyzacji Roslin. 1981;145:141-143.
15. Gurel S., Gurel E., Kaya Z. Doubled haploid plant production from unpollinated ovules of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2000;19:1155-1159. DOI 10.1007/s002990000248.
16. Hammond B.L. Homozygous diploid sugar beets. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 1966;14:75-78.
17. Herrmann L., Lux H. Antherenkultur bei Zuckerruben, Beta vulgaris L. var altissima. Arch. Zuchtungsforsch. Berlin. 1988a;18(6):375-383.
18. Herrmann L., Wetzel C., Lux H. Haploiden-technik bei der zuckerrube. Potsdam Forsch. B. 1988b;57:95-99.
19. Hosemans D., Bossoutrot D. Induction of haploid plant from in vitro culture of unpollinated beet ovules (Beta vulgaris L.). Z. Pf lanzenzucht. 1983;91(1):74-77.
20. Kharechko-Savitskaya E.I. Cytology and embryology of sugar beet. Beet growing. Kiev, 1940. (in Russian)
21. Klimek-Chodacka M., Baranski R. Comparison of haploid and doubled haploid sugar beet clones in their ability to micropropagate and regenerate. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013;16(2):1-1. DOI 10.2225/vol16-issue2-fulltext-3.
22. Kruse A. Haploids in polyembryos of beet, Beta vulgaris L. Roy. Vet. Agric. Coll. Copenhagen: Yearb, 1961;87-98.
23. Levan A. A haploid sugar beet after colchicine treatment. Hereditas. 1945;31(3-4):399-410. DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1945.tb02760.x.
24. Lukaszewska E., Sliwinska E. Most organs of sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants at the vegetative and reproductive stages of development are polysomatic. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2007;20:99- 107. DOI 10.1007/s00497-007-0047-7.
25. Lux H., Herrmann L., Wetzel C. Production on haploid sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) by culturing unpollinated ovules. Plant Breed. 1990; 104:177-183. DOI 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1990.tb00420.x.
26. Maletskii S.I., Yudanova S.S., Maletskaya E.I. Harmonic proportions of chloroplast number in stomata of guard cell populations in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2013;17(1):72-80. (in Russian)
27. Palmer C.D., Keller W.A. Overview of haploidy. In: Haploids in Crop Improvement II. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005;56:3-9. DOI 10.1007/3-540-26889-8_1.
28. Pazuki A., Aflaki F., Gürel S., Ergül A., Ekrem G. The effects of proline on in vitro proliferation and propagation of doubled haploid sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Turkish J. Bot. 2018a;42(3):280- 288. DOI 10.3906/bot-1709-14.
29. Pazuki A., Aflaki F., Gürel E., Ergül A., Gürel S. Gynogenesis Induction in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Improved by 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) and Synergized with Cold Pretreatment. Sugar Tech. 2018b;20:69-77. DOI 10.1007/s12355-017-0522-x.
30. Podvigina O.A. Theoretical substantiation and biotechnology methods in sugar beet breeding: Dr Sci. (Agricult.) Dissertation. Voronezh, 2003. (in Russian)
31. Sangwan R.S., Sangwan-Norreel B.S. Ultrastructural cytology of plastids in pollen grains of certain androgenic and nonandrogenic plants. Protoplasma. 1987;138:11-22. DOI 10.1007/BF01281180.
32. Seman I. Possibilities of detection and induction of haploids in Beta vulgaris L. II Biologia (Bratislava). 1983;38:1113-1122.
33. Seman I., Farago J. In vitro cultivation of unfertilized ovules of sugar beet. Embryology and seed reproduction: XI Int. Symp. Leningrad, USSR, July 3–4, 1990. Leningrad, 1990;146.
34. Svirshchevskaya A., Dolezel J. Production and Performance of Gynogenetic Sugarbeet Lines. J. Sugar Beet Res. USA. 2000;4(37):117-133.
35. Śliwińska E., Łukaszewska E. Polysomaty in growing in vitro sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) seedlings of different ploidy level. Plant Sci. 2005;168:1067-1074. DOI 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.12.003.
36. Tomaszewska-Sowa M. Cytometric analyses of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants regenerated from unfertilized ovules cultured in vitro. Plant Breed. 2010;2:231-235.
37. Van Geyt J., D’Halluin K., Jacobs M. Induction of nuclear and cell divisions in microspores of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Z. Pf lanzenzuecht. 1985;95:325-335.
38. Van Geyt J., Speckmann G.J., D’Halluin K., Jacobs M. In vitro induction of haploid plants from unpollinated ovules and ovaries of the sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1987;73:920-925. DOI 10.1007/BF00289399.
39. Vasilchenko E.N., Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Vashchenko T.G., Zemlyanukhina O.A., Karpechenko N.A., Podvigina O.A. Peculiarities of in vitro reproduction of sugar beet haploid regenerants. Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta = Vestnik of Voronezh State Agrarian University. 2017;3(54):57- 66. DOI 10.17238/issn2071-2243.2017.3.57. (in Russian)
40. Wremerth W.E., Levall M.W. Doubled haploid production of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): Published protocols for other crop plant species. Doubled Haploid Production in Crop Plants: A Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_38.
41. Yudanova S.S., Maletskaya E.I., Maletskii S.I. Epiplastome Variation of the Number of Chloroplasts in Stomata Guard Cells of Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Russ. J. Genet. 2004;40(7):930- 939. DOI 10.1023/B:RUGE.0000036525.14205.3f.
42. Zhuzhzhalova T.P., Kolesnikova E.O., Vasilchenko E.N., Cherkasova N.N. Biotechnological methods as a tool for efficient sugar beet breeding. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii = Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. 2020;24(1):40-47. DOI 10.18699/VJ20.593.
43. Zimmermann K. Vermendung haploider Pflanzen in der Zuchtung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges. 1953;66:28-30. DOI 10.1007/BF00710616.