Study of the progeny of sorghum mutants obtained using the CRISPR/Cas9 genetic construct directed at inducing mutations in the α-kafirin k1C5 gene

Site-directed mutagenesis using genetic constructs carrying the CRISPR/Cas system is an effective technology that is actively used to solve a variety of problems in plant genetics and breeding. One of these problems is to improve the nutritional value of grain sorghum, a high-yielding heat- and drought-tolerant cereal crop that is becoming increasingly important in the conditions of climate aridization. The main reason for the relatively low nutritional value of sorghum grain is the resistance of its storage proteins, kafirins, to proteolytic digestion. We have previously obtained mutants with improved kafirin in vitro digestibility using the CRISPR/Cas technology in grain sorghum variety Avance. The nucleotide sequence of one of the genes (k1C5) of the gene family encoding the signal polypeptide of 22 kDa α-kafirin was used as a target. The aim of this study was to investigate the manifestation of the main agronomically-important traits in the progeny of these mutants and inheritance of high in vitro protein digestibility, and also sequencing nucleotide sequences encoding the 22 kDa α-kafirin signal polypeptide in a number of plants from the T₀ generation and their T₁ progeny. It was revealed that four of the six studied T₀ plants, as well as their progeny, had the same mutation: a T→C substitution in the 23rd position of the nucleotide sequence of the k1C5 gene encoding the signal polypeptide, which led to a substitution of the coding triplet CTC→CCC (Leu→Pro). This mutation is located off-target, 3’ from the PAM sequence. It is suggested that this mutation may have arisen as a result of Cas9 nuclease errors caused by the presence of multiple PAM sequences located close to each other. It was found that the progeny of two of the three studied mutants (T₂ and T₃ families), grown in the experimental field conditions, differed from the original variety by a reduced plant height (by 12.4–15.5 %). The peduncle length, 1,000-grain mass, and grain mass per panicle did not differ from the original variety, with the exception of the progeny of the 2C-1.2.5b mutant, which had a reduced grain yield per panicle. Unlike the original variety, plants from the T₂ and T₃ generations had kernels with a modified type of endosperm (completely floury, or floury with inclusions of vitreous endosperm, or with a thin vitreous layer). The level of grain protein digestibility in the progeny of mutants 2C-2.1.1 #13 and 2C-1.2.5a #14 varied from 77 to 84 %, significantly exceeding the original variety (63.4 ± 2.3 %, p < 0.05). The level of protein digestibility from kernels with modified endosperm was higher than that of kernels with normal vitreous endosperm (84–93 %, p < 0.05). The reasons for the variation in endosperm texture in the progeny of the mutants and its relationship with the high digestibility of kafirins are discussed.

1. Aboubacar A., Axtell J.D., Huang C.P., Hamaker B.R. A rapid protein digestibility assay for identifying highly digestible sorghum lines. Cereal Chem. 2001;78:160-165. doi 10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.2.160

2. Balakrishna D., Singode A., Narasimham D., Venkatesh Bhat B. Current status and future prospects of genetic transformation and gene editing in sorghum. In: Tonapi V.A., Talwar H.S., Are A.K. (Eds) Sorghum in the 21st Century: Food – Fodder – Feed – Fuel for a Rapidly Changing World. Singapore: Springer, 2020;511-535. doi 10.1007/978-981-15-8249-3_21

3. Bean S.R., Ioerger B.P., Wilson J.D., Tilley M., Rhodes D., Herald T.J. Structure and chemistry of sorghum grain. In: Rooney W. (Ed.) Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Sorghum. Vol. 2. 2018. doi 10.19103/as.2017.0015.21

4. Belton P.S., Delgadillo I., Halford N.G., Shewry P.R. Kafirin structure and functionality. J Cereal Sci. 2006;44:272-286. doi 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.05.004

5. De Mesa-Stonestreet N.J., Alavi S., Bean S.R. Sorghum proteins: the concentration, isolation,modification, and food applications of kafirins. J Food Sci. 2010;75:90-104. doi 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01623.x

6. Duressa D., Weerasoriya D., Bean S.R., Tilley M., Tesso T. Genetic basis of protein digestibility in grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 2018;58(6): 2183-2199. doi 10.2135/cropsci2018.01.0038

7. Elkonin L.A., Italianskaya J.V., Fadeeva I.Yu., Bychkova V.V., Kozhemyakin V.V. In vitro protein digestibility in grain sorghum: effect of genotype and interaction with starch digestibility. Euphytica. 2013; 193:327-337. doi 10.1007/s10681-013-0920-4

8. Elkonin L.A., Panin V.M., Kenzhegulov O.A., Sarsenova S.Kh. RNAimutants of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench with improved digestibility of seed storage proteins. In: Jimenez-Lopez J.C. (Ed.) Grain and

9. Seed Proteins Functionality. London: Intech Open Ltd, 2021. doi 10.5772/intechopen.96204

10. Elkonin L.A., Gerashchenkov G.A., Borisenko N.V., Sarsenova S.Kh., Panin V.M. Development of sorghum mutants with improved in vitro protein digestibility by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of kafirin genes. The Crop J. 2023;11:1411-1418. doi 10.1016/j.cj.2023.02.005

11. Ezeogu L.I., Duodu K.G., Taylor J.R.N. Effects of endosperm texture and cooking conditions on the in vitro starch digestibility of sorghum and maize flours. J Cereal Sci. 2005;42:33-44. doi 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.02.002

12. Gao C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell. 2021;184:1621-1635. doi 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.005

13. Gerashchenkov G.A., Elkonin L.A., Gerashchenkov K.G., Rozhnova N.A., Hiekel S., Kumlehn J., Chemeris A.V. Binary vector construction for site-directed mutagenesis of kafirin genes in sorghum.

14. Amer J Plant Sci. 2021;12:1276-1287. doi 10.4236/ajps.2021.128089

15. Guo C., Ma X., Gao F., Guo Y. Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1143157. doi 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143157

16. Impa S.M., Perumal R., Bean S.R., Sunoj V.S.J., Jagadish S.V.K. Water deficit and heat stress induced alterations in grain physicochemical characteristics and micronutrient composition in field grown grain sorghum. J Cereal Sci. 2019;86:124-131. doi 10.1016/j.jcs.2019.01.013

17. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680-685.

18. Li A., Jia S., Yobi A., Ge Z., Sato S., Zhang C., Angelovici R., Clemente T.E., Holding D.R. Editing of an alpha-kafirin gene family increases, digestibility and protein quality in sorghum. Plant Physiol. 2018;177:1425-1438. doi 10.1104/pp.18.00200

19. Li X., Liu W., Wang G., Sai-Ming Sun S., Yuan L., Wang J. Improving digestibility of sorghum proteins by CRISPR/Cas9‐based genome editing. Food Energy Secur. 2024;13:e506. doi 10.1002/fes3.506

20. Massel K., Lam Y., Hintzsche J., Lester N., Botella J.R., Godwin I.D. Endogenous U6 promoters improve CRISPR/Cas9 editing efficiencies in Sorghum bicolor and show potential for applications in other cereals. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41:489-492. doi 10.1007/s00299-02102816-z

21. Massel K., Hintzsche J., Restall J. CRISPR-knockout of β-kafirin in sorghum does not recapitulate the grain quality of natural mutants. Planta. 2023;257:8. doi 10.1007/s00425-022-04038-3

22. Movahedi A., Aghaei-Dargiri S., Li H., Zhuge Q., Sun W. CRISPR variants for gene editing in plants: biosafety risks and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:16241. doi 10.3390/ijms242216241

23. Nunes A., Correia I., Barros A., Delgadillo I. Sequential in vitro pepsin digestion of uncooked and cooked sorghum and maize samples. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52:2052-2058. doi 10.1021/jf0348830

24. Odipio J., Alicai T., Ingelbrecht I., Nusinow D.A., Bart R., Taylor N.J. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of Phytoene desaturase in Cassava. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1780. doi 10.3389/fpls.2017.01780

25. Parikh A., Brant E.J., Baloglu M.C. CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in sorghum – recent progress, challenges and prospects. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol – Plant. 2021;57:720-730. doi 10.1007/s11627-021-10215-y

26. Saini H., Thakur R., Gill R., Tyagi K., Goswami M. CRISPR/Cas9-gene editing approaches in plant breeding. GM Crops & Food. 2023;14: 1-17. doi 10.1080/21645698.2023.2256930

27. Sturme M.H.J., van der Berg J.P., Bouwman L.M.S., De Schrijver A., de Maagd R.A., Kleter G.A., Battaglia-de Wilde E. Occurrence and nature of off-target modifications by CRISPR-Cas genome editing in plants. ACS Agric Sci Technol. 2022;2:192-201. doi 10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270

28. Wong A.C.S., Lam Y., Hintzsche J., Restall J., Godwin I.D. Genome editing towards sorghum improvement. In: Zhao K., Mishra R., Joshi R.K. (Eds) Genome Editing Technologies for Crop Improvement. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2022;295-321. doi 10.1007/978981-19-0600-8_14

29. Wong J.H., Lau T., Cai N., Singh J., Pedersen J.F., Vensel W.H., Hurkman W.J., Wilson J.D., Lemaux P.G., Buchanan B.B. Digestibility of protein and starch from sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is linked to biochemical and structural features of grain endosperm. J Cereal Sci. 2009;49:73-82. doi 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.07.013

30. Wong J.H., Marx D.B., Jeff D., Wilson J.D., Buchanan B.B., Lemaux P.G., Pedersen J.F. Principal component analysis and biochemical characterization of protein and starch reveal primary targets for improving sorghum grain. Plant Science. 2010;179:598611. doi 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.020

31. Zhang G., Hamaker B.R. Low α-amylase starch digestibility of cooked sorghum flours and the effect of protein. Cereal Chem. 1998;75: 710-713. doi 10.1094/CCHEM.1998.75.5.710

32. Zhu H., Li C., Gao C. Applications of CRISPR-Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:661-677. doi 10.1038/s41580-020-00288-9