Issues of interspecific hybridization between Solanum lycopersicum L. and Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam.

Interspecific hybridization plays a crucial role in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) breeding for introducing beneficial traits from wild relatives, such as resistance to biotic and abiotic stress. Sticky nightshade (Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam.) is a promising source for the introgression of desirable traits. Reports on hybridization between S. lycopersicum and S. sisymbriifolium remain contradictory, differently describing the progeny as doubled haploids or interspecific hybrids. In the present study, we clarify the nature of the progeny derived from hybridization between S. lycopersicum and S. sisymbriifolium by analyzing the early stages of ovule development and characterizing the morphological and cytogenetic features of the resulting plants. Interspecific hybridization between S. lycopersicum and S. sisymbriifolium encounters postzygotic reproductive barriers. Only a small proportion of developing ovules in male-sterile tomato lines, whether self-pollinated or pollinated with S. sisymbriifolium followed the normal developmental pathway. In most cases, either ovule development was arrested, or parthenocarpic seed-like bodies formed instead of normal seeds. Embryo rescue enabled the recovery of 12 plants resulting from interspecific hybridization of S. lycopersicum and S. sisymbriifolium. Morphologically, the plants closely resembled the S. lycopersicum parent, although they displayed several traits distinctive from those of the parental tomato lines. Notably, yellow-orange mature fruits developed in progeny from the cross of green-fruited S. lycopersicum and red-fruited S. sisymbriifolium. Analysis of chromosome numbers in root meristems revealed mixoploidy (2n = 16–26), and meiotic analysis during microsporogenesis showed multiple aberrations in meiosis. Thus, comprehensive embryological, morphological, and cytogenetic analyses provide evidence for the hybrid origin of the obtained plants. This confirms the possibility of overcoming postzygotic barriers between these species and opens avenues for the utilization of S. sisymbriifolium in tomato breeding programs.

1. Abbas M.M., Ghani M.A., Ziaf K., Khan T.N., Jahangir M.M., Awan F.S., Hussain M.M. Development and characterization of F1 hybrid tomato by inter and intraspecific hybridization. Pak J Agric Sci. 2024;61(1):199-207. doi 10.21162/PAKJAS/24.218

2. Ajaharuddin S.M., Lal M., Yadav A., Kumar N., Dhakad A., Sinha G., Singh B.P., Upadhyay A. Breeding for resistance against pest and diseases in tomatoes: a review. J Sci Res Rep. 2024;30(6):469-479. doi 10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i62063

3. Baek Y.S., Royer S.M., Broz A.K., Covey P.A., López‐Casado G., Nuñez R., Kear P.J., Bonierbale M., Orillo M., van der Knaap E., Stack S.M., McClure B., Chetelat R.T., Bedinger P.A. Interspecific reproductive barriers between sympatric populations of wild tomato species (Solanum section Lycopersicon). Am J Bot. 2016;103(11): 1964-1978. doi 10.3732/ajb.1600356

4. Bal U., Abak K. Attempts of haploidy induction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) via gynogenesis I: pollination with Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam. pollen. Pak J Biol Sci. 2003;6(8):745-749. doi 10.3923/pjbs.2003.745.749

5. Barykina R.P., Veselova T.D., Devyatov A.G., Dzhalilova Kh. Kh., Iljina G.M., Chubatova N.V. Handbook of Botanical Microtechnique. Principles and methods. Moscow: MSU Publ., 2004 (in Russian)

6. Biswas D., Haque S.M., Ghosh B. Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam.: an underutilised plant with future prospects in nutrition and medicine. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad. 2023;89(3):445-469. doi 10.1007/s43538-023-00191-9

7. Chaban I., Baranova E., Kononenko N., Khaliluev M., Smirnova E. Distinct differentiation characteristics of endothelium determine its ability to form pseudo-embryos in tomato ovules. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(1):12. doi 10.3390/ijms21010012

8. Chambonnet D. Essais d’haploidisation de la tomate. In: Report D’Activite 1995–1996 Station D’Amelioration Des Plantes Maraicheres D’Avignon-Montfavet, 1996;84-85

9. Collonnier C., Fock I., Daunay M.C., Servaes A., Vedel F., Siljak-Yakovlev S., Souvannavong V., Sihachakr D. Somatic hybrids between Solanum melongena and S. sisymbriifolium, as a useful source of resistance against bacterial and fungal wilts. Plant Sci. 2003;164(5):849-861. doi 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00075-X

10. Cooper D.C. Macrosporogenesis and the development of the macrogametophyte of Lycopersicon esculentum. Am J Bot. 1931;18(9): 739-748. doi 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1931.tb04945.x

11. Flier W.G., Van Den Bosch G.B.M., Turkensteen L.J. Epidemiological importance of Solanum sisymbriifolium, S. nigrum and S. dulcamara as alternative hosts for Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathol. 2003; 52(5):595-603. doi 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00922.x

12. Foolad M.R. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. Int J Plant Genomics. 2007;2007(1):64358. doi 10.1155/2007/64358

13. Gavrilenko T., Thieme R., Rokka V.M. Cytogenetic analysis of Lycopersicon esculentum (+) Solanum etuberosum somatic hybrids and their androgenetic regenerants. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;103(2): 231-239. doi 10.1007/s001220100626

14. Hajihassani A., Rutter W.B., Schwarz T., Woldemeskel M., Ali M.E., Hamidi N. Characterization of resistance to major tropical root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Solanum sisymbriifolium. Phytopathology. 2020;110(3):666-673. doi 10.1094/PHYTO-10-19-0393-R

15. Harberd D.J. A simple effective embryo culture technique for brassica. Euphytica. 1969;18:425-429. doi 10.1007/BF00397792

16. Kapil R.N., Tiwari S.C. The integumentary tapetum. Bot Rev. 1978; 44(4):457-490. doi 10.1007/BF02860847

17. Kirov I., Divashuk M., Van Laere K., Soloviev A., Khrustaleva L. An easy “SteamDrop” method for high quality plant chromosome preparation. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7(1):21. doi 10.1186/1755-8166-7-21

18. Lindstrom E.W., Koos K. Cyto-genetic investigations of a haploid tomato and its diploid and tetraploid progeny. Am J Bot. 1931;18(6): 398-410. doi 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1931.tb09599.x

19. Palamarchuk I.A., Veselova T.D., Antonova T.S. Peculiarities of the reproductive organ development in glasshouse tomatoes. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. 1975;8(6):113-116 (in Russian)

20. Piosik Ł., Ruta-Piosik M., Zenkteler M., Zenkteler E. Development of interspecific hybrids between Solanum lycopersicum L. and S. sisymbriifolium Lam. via embryo calli. Euphytica. 2019;215(2):31. doi 10.1007/s10681-019-2358-9

21. Roth M., Florez-Rueda A.M., Griesser S., Paris M., Städler T. Incidence and developmental timing of endosperm failure in post-zygotic isolation between wild tomato lineages. Ann Bot. 2018;121(1):107-118. doi 10.1093/aob/mcx133

22. Rubio F., Alonso A., García-Martínez S., Ruiz J.J. Introgression of virus-resistance genes into traditional Spanish tomato cultivars (Solanum lycopersicum L.): effects on yield and quality. Sci Hortic. 2016; 198:183-190. doi 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.025

23. Ruzin S.E. Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. Oxford University Press, 1999

24. Sadashiva A.T., Hanson P., Reddy M.K., Ravishankar K.V., Prasad M., Prasanna H.C., Madhavi Reddy K., … Kumar M., Kaushal A., Rai A.K., Jatav V., Bhat L. Breeding tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. J Hortl Sci. 2017;12(2):91-105. doi 10.24154/jhs.v12i2.2

25. Schindfessel C., De Storme N., Trinh H.K., Geelen D. Asynapsis and meiotic restitution in tomato male meiosis induced by heat stress. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1210092. doi 10.3389/fpls.2023.1210092

26. Yerasu S.R., Gowda M.T., Krishna R., Kaur C., Singh S., Saha S., Kumar R. Development of interspecific hybrids through embryo rescue for heat-stable nematode resistance (Mi­9 gene) from Solanum arcanum in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2023;154(3):703-711. doi 10.1007/s11240-023-02544-0