Informative EST-SSR markers for genotyping and intraspecific differentiation of Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.

Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. is characterized by a high level of intraspecific heterogeneity due to some biological features that cause difficulties for breeding creating genetically homogenous forms and maintaining their genetic purity. Microsatellites (SSR) are highly polymorphic markers of plant genomes and represent one of the most effective tools for assessing genetic polymorphism. Among microsatellites, EST-SSR are most interesting, because they are directly linked to the expressed sequences and for that reason are widely used for analysis of genetic diversity and population structure. In this work, we studied the effectiveness of the use of transferable EST-SSR markers for both analyzing white cabbage diversity and genotyping pure lines. As a result, 15 microsatellite loci were characterized for the information content, allelic frequencies and heterogeneity levels. The effective multiallelic markers (Bo20TR, BoDCTD4, BoPC34, BoPLD1, BoCalc, BoPC15) with high information content (PIC > 0.7) that could be successfully used for analysis of inter- and intravarietal polymorphism in B. oleracea var. capitata were identified. It has been shown that intervarietal polymorphism expressed as the allelic diversity of EST SSR loci greatly facilitates varietal identification and typing of individual plants for breeding purposes. Based on the SSR-evaluation and subsequent clustering, the genetic structure of the breeding collection was identified, which showed that most experimental forms, in spite of different origin, have a common ancestral genetic basis. The identified donors of rare alleles could potentially be a source of valuable genetic segregation for further B. oleracea breeding improvement.

1. Belaj A., Satovich Z., Ismaili H., Panajoti D., Rallo L., Trujillo I. RAPD genetic diversity of Albanian olive germplasm and its relationships with other Mediterranian countries. Euphytica. 2003;130:387-395. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023042014081

2. Bhargava A., Fuentes F.F. Mutational dynamics of microsatellites. Mol. Biotechnol. 2010;44(3):250-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-009-9230-4

3. Cho Y.G., Ishii T., Temnykh S., Chen X. Diversity of microsatellites derived from genomic libraries and GenBank sequences in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000;100:713-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051343

4. Eujay I., Sorrells M.E., Baum M., Wolters P., Powell W. Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002;104:399-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100738

5. Fang Zh., Liu Y., Lou P., Liu G. Current trends in cabbage breeding. J. New Seeds. 2005;6(2/3):75-107. https://doi.org/10.1300/J153v06n02_05

6. Kapil A., Rai P.K., Shanker A. ChloroSSRdb: a repository of perfect and imperfect chloroplastic simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs) of green plants. Database. Online J. of Biological Databases and Curation. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bau107

7. Kashi Y., King D.G. Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution. Trends Genet. 2006;22:253-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2006.03.00

8. Katti M.V., Ranjekar P.K., Gupta V.S. Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001;18:1161-1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003903

9. Liu L., Liu G., Gong Y. Evaluation of genetic purity of F1 hybrid seeds in cabbage with RAPD, ISSR, SRAP, and SSR markers. Hortscience. 2007;42(3):724-727. (http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/42/3/724.full)

10. Louarn S., Torp A.M., Holme I.B., Andersen S.B., Jensen B.D. Database derived microsatellite markers (SSRs) for cultivar differentiation in Brassica oleracea L. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2007;54:1717-1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9181-6

11. Morgante M., Hanafey M., Powell W. Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:194-200. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng822

12. Peakall R., Smouse P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537-2539.

13. Pritchard M., Wen W., Falush D. Documentation for Structure Software: Version 2.3. Department of Human Genetic, Department of Statistics. University of Chicago USA, 2009. https://doi.org/http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/home.html

14. Reif J.C., Warburton M.L., Xia X.C., Hoisington D.A., Crossa J., Taba S., Muminovic J., Bohn M., Frisch M., Melchinger A.E. Grouping of accessions of Mexican races of maize revisited with SSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006;113:177-185. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00122-006-0283-5

15. Senan S., Kizhakayil D., Sasicumar B., Sheeja Th. Methods for development of microsatellite markers: an overview. Not. Sci. Biol. 2014;6(1):1-13. (http://notulaebiologicae.ro/index.php/nsb/article/viewFile/9199/7883)

16. Tonguc M., Griffiths Ph.D. Genetic relationships of Brassica vegetables determined using database derived simple sequence repeats. Euphytica. 2004;137:193-201. https://doi.org/ 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000041577.84388.43

17. Ye Sh., Wang Y., Huang D., Li J., Gong Y., Xu L., Liu L. Genetic purity testing of F1 hybrid seed with molecular markers in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Sci. Hortic. 2013;155:92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.03.016

18. Zhang L., Yuan D., Yu Sh., Li Zh., Cao Y., Miao Zh., Qian H., Tang K. Preference of simple sequence repeats in coding and non-coding regions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Bioinformatics. 2004;20(7):1081-1086. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth043