Identification and analysis of the connection network structure between the components of the immune system in children

   Identification of the connections between the various functional components of the immune system is a crucial task in modern immunology. It is key to implementing the systems biology approach to understand the mechanisms of dynamic changes and outcomes of infectious and oncological diseases. The data characterizing an individual’s immune status typically have a high-dimensional state space and a small sample size. To study the network topology of the immune system, we utilized previously published original data from Toptygina et al. (2023), which included measurements of the immune status in 19 healthy individuals (children, 9 boys and 10 girls, aged 1 to 2 years), i. e., the immune cells (42 subpopulations) obtained by flow cytometry; cytokine levels (13 types) obtained by multiplex analysis; and antibody levels (4 types) determined by using enzyme immunoassay. To correctly identify statistically significant correlations between the measured variables and construct the respective network graph, it is necessary to use an approach that takes into account the small size of the dataset. In this study, we implemented and analyzed an approach based on the regularized debiased sparse partial correlation (DSPC) algorithm to evaluate sparse partial correlations and identify the network structure of relationships in the immune system of healthy individuals (children) based on immune status data, which includes a set of indicators for subpopulations of immune cells, cytokine levels, and antibodies. For different levels of statistical significance, heatmaps of the partial correlations were constructed. The graph visualization of the DSPC networks was performed, and their topological characteristics were analyzed. It is found that with a limited measurements sample, the choice of a statistical significance threshold critically affects the structure of the partial correlations matrix. The final verification of the immunologically correct structure of the correlation-based network requires both an increase in the sample size and consideration of a priori mechanistic views and models of the functioning of the immune system components. The results of this analysis can be used to select the therapy targets and design combination therapies.

1. Armingol E., Baghdassarian H.M., Lewis N.E. The diversification of methods for studying cell­cell interactions and communication. Nat Rev Genet. 2024;25(6):381­400. doi: 10.1038/s41576­023­00685­8

2. Atallah M.B., Tandon V., Hiam K.J., Boyce H., Hori M., Atallah W., Spitzer M.H., Engleman E., Mallick P. ImmunoGlobe: enabling systems immunology with a manually curated intercellular immune interaction network. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12859­020­03702­3

3. Basu S., Duren W., Evans C.R., Burant C.F., Michailidis G., Karnovsky A. Sparse network modeling and metscape­based visualization methods for the analysis of large­scale metabolomics data. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(10):1545­1553. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx012

4. Cortese M., Hagan T., Rouphael N., Wu S.Y., Xie X., Kazmin D., Wimmers F., … Subramaniam S., Mulligan M.J., Khurana S., Golding H., Pulendran B. System vaccinology analysis of predictors and mechanisms of antibody response durability to multiple vaccines in humans. Nat Immunol. 2025;26(1):116­130. doi: 10.1038/s41590024­02036­z

5. Epskamp S., Fried E.I. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018;23(4):617­634. doi: 10.1037/met0000167

6. Murphy K., Weaver C. Janeway’s Immunobiology. New York, NY: Garland Science/Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. ISBN 978­0­8153­4505­3 Available: https://inmunologos.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/janeways-immunobiology-9th-ed_booksmedicos.org_.pdf

7. Ng C.T., Snell L.M., Brooks D.G., Oldstone M.B. Networking at the level of host immunity: immune cell interactions during persistent viral infections. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13(6):652­664. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.05.014

8. Qiao L., Khalilimeybodi A., Linden­Santangeli N.J., Rangamani P. The evolution of systems biology and systems medicine: From mechanistic models to uncertainty quantification. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2025;27(1):425­447. doi: 10.1146/annurev­bioeng­102723065309

9. Rieckmann J.C., Geiger R., Hornburg D., Wolf T., Kveler K., Jarrossay D., Sallusto F., Shen­Orr S.S., Lanzavecchia A., Mann M., Meissner F. Social network architecture of human immune cells unveiled by quantitative proteomics. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(5):583593. doi 10.1038/ni.3693

10. Shilts J., Severin Y., Galaway F., Müller­Sienerth N., Chong Z.S., Pritchard S., Teichmann S., Vento­Tormo R., Snijder B., Wright G.J. A physical wiring diagram for the human immune system. Nature. 2022;608(7922):397­404. doi: 10.1038/s41586­022­05028­x. Erratum in: Nature. 2024;635(8037):E1. doi: 10.1038/s41586­024­07928­6

11. Toptygina A., Grebennikov D., Bocharov G. Prediction of specific antibody­ and cell­mediated responses using baseline immune status parameters of individuals received measles­mumps­rubella vaccine. Viruses. 2023;15(2):524. doi: 10.3390/v15020524